Archive for the ‘Abortion-Contraception’ Category

Mental Illness and Casual Sex: A Father’s Plea

Sunday, May 1st, 2011

To whom it may concern:

I would like to write a letter to describe as best I can my thoughts on the relationship between men and women and their relationship to God and moral values.

Before I go into that, I would like to make a few comments on the relationship between mental health and sexual intercourse outside of marriage.

Many people believe that allowing people with chemical imbalances or mental illnesses to have casual sex is something that is good for them.  They believe that men and women naturally need to have sexual relief and pleasure in order to be happy.  That it is not only ok but therapeutic to engage in such behavior.  The only “problem” in their minds is the need not to get STDs nor to get pregnant.  Hence, the “solution” to this “problem” is to get sterilized and then to practice “safe sex” by using condoms to avoid diseases.  They believe that satisfying the biological urges will make that person somehow better, more stable, and happier.

Well, let’s talk a bit about sex.  The sexual act is an act so personal, so intimate, that our very beings unite in some way with our partner….that we do become “one” in some mysterious way and that there is a tremendous bonding that takes place which is permanent and deep.  That this happens seems pretty clear.

When a person who suffers from low self esteem, rejection, failed goals, and constant turmoil in their emotional lives are suddenly lifted above all this for a momentary time, one would think that this is a good.  However, the down side to this is that the great emotional bond and spiritual link to this person is not real, not lasting, and without any commitment for the future.  The net result is that this person is now even worse off due to the stress and strain of yet another rejection at the most profound level of his or her soul.  To set up a situation whereby a person is encouraged to gratify sexual urges as a positive end in itself ends up turning around what appears to be a good thing into a trap for furthering depression, guilt, and even lower self esteem.

There was a case that I knew of where a friend of mine had a boy with Downs Syndrome and they had him institutionalized after a certain age.  Well in this facility they sterilized all the clients and then paired them up and each week they had “sex night” which they spent together with their partner.  The idea here is to offer sexual gratification to these people with no apparent down-side.  Who are we to believe that we can do this with people?  Have these adults no dignity and who are we to allow this?  Who is the one to say that without sexual gratification that life is not worth living?  Who is to say that no man or woman is able to live without it?

My point is that there is a great danger to a person’s emotional well being to engage in casual sex for fun when the impact on a person is so serious and deep.

Would it not be better to take a higher road and strive to work on a person’s self esteem through progress in very human activities such as creative expression, providing mechanisms whereby the stronger ones can help and instruct the weaker ones?  Can we not encourage positive actions to deepen our internal feelings about our own self worth….first in God’s eyes and then in our fellow man’s eyes?  It is quite known that people who are close to God and pray carry a special peace in their hearts which helps them get through life.  Could we not help these people draw closer to God and fill their hearts with his love rather then to satisfy sexual urges?

God created sex to propagate the human species.  His plan according to my understanding is to structure a secure STABLE environment for a man and a woman to join, reproduce, and care for the offspring.  The best way for this to be done is with one couple, their children, one home, over a long period of time.  Out of this stable environment called marriage the sex act is brought out.  Next God allows the intercourse to be pleasurable to support the drive to reproduce because raising a kid is hard.  God also turns off the ability to have kids on a regular basis and for good after a certain age.  The first purpose of intercourse is procreation…whether or not a child is conceived.  The point is that the union is open to procreation.  There actually is a very good form of birth control which is practiced by Catholics and it is called NFP….Natural Family Planning and the success rate of those who properly utilize this process is higher than that of condoms for example….the difference here is that there is NO sex during the times that the woman could become pregnant.  To block procreation by sterilization (permanently) or with birth control goes against God’s plan for the marriage union.

As a side point, there are natural results of going against God’s will for using abortion, sterilization, or birth control and that is that nations will literally disappear and the people are not reproducing enough to replace themselves and the nation will just wimp away.  Also, in the US, with 50 million babies killed through abortion….guess what?  The money to support the parents who aborted their kids will not be there for them to live on as the kids are not there to pay taxes.

God has a plan for us.  This plan is pretty much known, or could easily be known, to us; but, we, like our freedom to do whatever we want, particularly stuff which is fun or pleasurable, and blow-off such talk of God’s plan to religious “nut-jobs”.  But there is a price to pay for ignoring the way God wants us to live…..and that price involves things which go on deep within our heart.

Casual sex will not improve my daughter’s life.

Sterilizing her could seriously impact her self esteem as a woman and drive her into deeper depression….a dangerous thing for her fragile state.

My daughter needs to focus on healing, being productive through volunteer or paid work, be encouraged to stay active in her faith which HAS demonstrated to be of benefit to her, to have wholesome and uplifting relationships, to be closer to her family after this pregnancy, and to establish goals which demonstrate that she can be successful in some limited way…but enough to bring her peace and tranquility in her life.

Anonymous

The Pope’s Remarks about Condoms

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

I take it for granted that you have heard about the Pope’s remarks about condoms in an interview that was part of a book.  In the event that you have not yet seen an informed Catholic response to all the fuss being made about those remarks, be assured that what Pope Benedict XVI said about those things has absolutely nothing to do with Catholic teaching about birth control.

The focus of Catholic teaching in Casti Connubii and Humanae Vitae is against contraceptive behaviors because they morally disfigure the marriage act.  Catholic teaching condemns the use of condoms as a method of contraception, that is, a behavior designed to prevent conception and thus designed to contradict the built-in for-better-and-for-worse meaning of the marriage act.

The Pope’s example of a homosexual prostitute using condoms illustrates a key difference between homosexual sodomy and the heterosexual marriage act.  First of all, homosexual sodomy is not and never can be a marriage act.  Secondly, the purpose and the effect of condoms used in the copulation of homosexual sodomists is not contraception because conception is impossible between two sodomists.  In fact, it is only in the case of homosexual sodomy that condoms act exclusively as non-contraceptive agents of disease limitation.

The Pope has not given a back-door rationalization for heterosexual couples to use condoms as agents of disease limitation.  In all heterosexual cases, the use of condoms to reduce the spread of a disease is a contraceptive act because it seeks to prevent the transmission of semen.  It should also be noted that while any use of condoms may slow down the spread of a sexually transmitted disease, it does not truly prevent its transmission and spread.  Only abstinence has that blessed effect.

The papal remarks have been interpreted by some as permission for heterosexuals to use condoms if they have the good intention of disease prevention or slowing its spread.  Not so.  A good intention does not make a bad act good.  (On the other hand, a bad intention can make an otherwise good act bad.)

Unfortunately, the Pope missed an opportunity to teach the evil of sodomy.  It might have been instructive if he had replied in this vein:  “You are asking about sodomy, an act that is the grave matter of mortal sin by which the agents put themselves on the road to hell.  You are asking if the use of a condom in homosexual sodomy adds a second mortal sin.  Well, as you know, Catholic teaching condemns the use of contraceptive behaviors, but sodomy can be described as already an essentially non-conceptive or contraceptive behavior, so a condom does not make it even more contraceptive.  Therefore, if the use of a condom by sodomists adds a second mortal sin to the already sinful act, it would be for other reasons such as scandal or greater frequency.  Etc.”

The only real lesson from this episode is that Pope Benedict may need to be more prudent when he is speaking with journalists about issues that are so open to misinterpretation.  He is a great writer, and I wish he would write an encyclical commemorating Casti Connubii which will be 80 years young and still tremendously relevant on December 31, 2010.

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality
Ignatius 2005

Why Catholic schools are closing?

Sunday, November 14th, 2010

Fr. Timothy J. Sauppé, a pastor of St, Mary’s Catholic Church in Westville IL,  explained to his parishioners his decision to close the parish school in May 2010.  There were two reasons:    “lack of incoming/retention of students and lack of income to both the school and the parish.”   But he added:     “Let me be frank, the problem here is much deeper than money and it is a problem not just at St. Mary’s but across our Western culture. The problem is cited in the concluding paragraph in my letter to Bishop Jenky:

Bishop, it is with a heavy heart that I request this of you. As you know, priests were not ordained to be closing grade schools but we were ordained to be Christ in the midst of sorrow and pain which will be happening as we come to accept both your decision and the inevitable that St. Mary’s Grade School is no longer viable. The efficient cause is simple….no children. The first cause is the habitual contraception and sterilization mentality of a good portion of married Catholic Christians–in short the culture of death. The final cause is the closure of Catholic Schools and parishes. Bishop, we need your leadership to address the contraception/abortion/sterilization mentality in as a forceful a way as soon as possible. This was my recommendation to the Meitler Study and it is my recommendation to you for the good of the Diocese of Peoria. May God Bless you in your ministry as our Bishop.

Sincerely yours in Christ Jesus and Mary,
Fr. Timothy J. Sauppé, pastor
St. Mary’s Catholic Church”

Another comment from Fr. Timothy J. Sauppé:  “The greatest challenge we have as priests is contraception.  It is killing our parishes left and right. As long as bishops and priests say nothing about contraception we will not grow as a Church or as a society.”  ( “Madonna Chapel: Fostering the dignity of Motherhood,” by Kate Williams, Canticle magazine, Jan/Feb 2010, p. 23)