Archive for the ‘Abortion-Contraception’ Category

Decreased Breastfeeding and Contraception

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

Allow me to offer an opinion on at least one cause of the population panic of the last 40-some years. For centuries, breastfeeding kept the world population stable or at a low growth. The abandonment of breastfeeding in the 1930s was accompanied by the growth of contraception and so population remained stable. In the 1950s, the postwar boom in having babies was welcomed by almost everyone, but it put a tremendous burden on moms who were having babies every year because of the lack of breastfeeding. This induced the panic reflected in Ehrlich’s negative fantasy of 1968. It also helped to induce panic in the Catholic population and the consequent rejection of Catholic teaching regarding unnatural forms of birth control.
    One answer to the problem is what my wife has termed “ecological breastfeeding” or eco-breastfeeding for short. Even in the culture of the United States, mothers who do this type of breastfeeding average between 14 and 15 months before they have their first postpartum period. In some less-developed cultures, breastfeeding accounts for average birth intervals of 48 months with no contraception or taboos against intercourse while nursing. The Eskimos used to keep  their families to 3 to 4 children using traditional breastfeeding.
    God has a plan revealed in the book of Nature and we need to respect it.

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant

One’s observation of Catholics on life and contraception

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

The following is a message from a correspondent who chooses to remain anonymous:

This is just one almost-convert’s perspective, which is probably not worth too much.

First, in any parish we have visited in this area, we are often the largest family (six children).  Usually an elderly lady will come up to us and smile and say, “We had seven, dear” or, “I remember when we filled up a pew.”  Anyone our age will say, “You sure have your hands full!” while they have two or three children in tow.  There is a decided “closedness” to life.  Since having four children, we have always been asked by strangers if we were Catholic or Mormon.  The world just assumes Catholics are open to life.  In general, we have not found it to be true, at least in this geographical area.  I feel this is a cause of scandal.  On the other hand, the families who are open to life shine brightly in the darkness.

Second, my friends who are life-long Catholics, the parents of 9, and have always lived in this area, say there is a “hands off” approach by the clergy when it comes to the topic of contraception. That is why they sent us their Bishop’s booklet on the 40th Anniversary of Humanae Vitae.  They were so excited that someone had the courage to say contraception is wrong.  This is sad, but at least it is a step in the right direction.  I think any couple who reads that booklet and wants to learn more would easily find your website by a Google search. 

And finally, (again, just my opinion), many families don’t want to hear about ecological breastfeeding because it is a lifestyle.  I have to admit, it was easy for me because I already loved being with my babies.  I never have felt right about being apart from them, even for a short time.  My mother was that way, and I guess it is natural to me.  But for the mother who is used to being apart from her baby, it seems too great a sacrifice to change her lifestyle.  I feel this is sad. I agree wholeheartedly with you—eco-breastfeeding is God’s simple plan to space babies.  And in many cultures, the women would probably think it was funny for us in the West to even need to discuss it; it truly is “natural mothering” and only needs explaining when “unnatural” has become the norm.

To me it is so simple.  Every baby deserves his mother’s undivided attention.  My oldest child is 12, and judging by the late nights we spend talking over the issues of the universe, it is obvious to me that they still need their mother.  As my friend says, “Mother is a noun and a verb!”  It is the verb aspect that has gone out of style. 

Sadly, it seems there is a fear to proclaim this truth of natural mothering in the Church.  I believe that natural mothering is God’s best for families.  In our culture it is indeed controversial.  But we can pray.  It is truly, in my humble opinion, God’s “Plan A” for the home.  If it is a facet of God’s truth, it is the job of the Church to proclaim it, but it will certainly not be easy for them in the current culture. 

Whenever I consider the fact that my husband is entering the Church with me, and I listen to him explain the Faith to other people, I am reassured that prayer is a powerful weapon and God can do anything!  I will make natural mothering a top priority as I pray each morning because it is so very important.  It is a matter of life and death, particularly in the current anti-family mindset that is worsening all the time.

I am sorry this is so long!  I have just been thinking about this today and it is all spilling over here.  God bless you again and again.–Anonymous

Djerassi: Inventor of the Pill Still in Denial; The Pope was right on AIDS.

Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

Carl Djerassi, one of the three co-inventors of the Pill back in the 1950s, has recently acknowledged a “demographic catastrophe” due to birth control.  He is the chemist who first developed synthetic progesterone.  This was a key step in the development and marketing of the first oral contraceptive—the “Pill,” because it did not break down when taken orally, as natural progesterone does. 

According to a website biography, he had absolutely no intentions of developing a birth control drug although he has been frequently referred to as the father of the Pill. 

He was born into a Jewish family in Vienna, Austria (October 29, 1923), moved to Bulgaria in 1939 to escape the Nazis, and then moved to the United States in 1941.  He earned his doctorate at the University of Wisconsin in 1945 and became a professor of Chemistry at Stanford University in 1959.  That was shortly after his development of synthetic progesterone.

In 1981 Djerassi was awarded the Nobel prize in physics for development of laser spectroscopy; in 1991 he closed his laboratory, and in 2002 he said goodbye to classroom teaching. 

In 2001 Stanford University issued a press release about Professor Djerassi on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Pill.  It noted that in his new book to be released on October 15 that year, The Man’s Pill, he reflected on his role in the development of the Pill.  In flattering terms he wrote of his extended influence through that invention.  Before that, he says, he had been a rather detached scientist, but the Pill made him more socially conscious for which he was proud.

Last October, at age 85, the Professor wrote an article the Austrian newspaper, Der Standard, in October, 2008 on the occasion of his birthday and the 50th anniversary of the Anschluss.  In it he reflected on the demographics of Austria.  He also noted that in most of Europe there is now “no connection at all between sexuality and reproduction… This divide in Catholic Austria, a country which has on average 1.4 children per family, is now complete.”  Understandably, this was reported by some to be a repudiation of the Pill.  Not so, replied Djerassi on January 27 in the The Guardian, an English publication.

His real subject of attack, he said was an anti-immigration bloc in Austria, “I warned against an impending demographic catastrophe. Without immigration, a country requires 2.1 children per family to maintain its population level; so those xenophobic Austrians would have to have at least three children (which I considered totally unlikely) in order to raise the small size of most of their compatriots’ families to a national average of 2.1.

“I drew attention to Bulgaria, a country to which I fled in 1938 from Nazi Austria, and which possesses roughly the same current population, age distribution and average family size (1.4 children) as Austria. Nobody these days wants to emigrate to Bulgaria, in contrast to Austria or other western European countries. As a result, demographic estimates predict a 35% drop in Bulgaria’s current population by 2050.

“I also indicated that Germany’s family size (1.3 children) requires an annual immigration of 200,000 just to maintain the current population. Consequently, I emphasised the need in Austria for continuing immigration.”

The retired professor remains in denial.  He doesn’t deny that birth control has had a catastrophic effect on the population of Europe, but he denies that the Pill is responsible for it.  It is true that there are other methods of birth control, but to deny the key role of the Pill in kindling the sexual revolution is to be morally and intellectually blind.  The purveyors of sexual promiscuity, pornography, and abortion are deeply indebted to Carl Djerassi.  The rest of us are indebted for another reason.  He developed a synthetic hormone that is used in pest control. 

Harvard AIDS Researcher Backs the Pope: This is must reading in the context of all the criticism that the Pope has received for his statements on AIDS.

John F. Kippley