Archive for the ‘Abortion-Contraception’ Category

Why is Contraception Wrong?

Sunday, August 19th, 2012

1.  It contradicts God’s plan for love, marriage and sexuality.
God has a plan for love, marriage and sexuality.  In that plan, the marriage act is meant to be exclusively a marriage act.  That means that such an action outside of marriage is intrinsically dishonest, pretending to be what it cannot be.  The Bible calls such actions fornication and adultery.
In God’s plan, the marriage act within marriage is intended to be a renewal of the marriage covenant the couple freely entered.  It ought to affirm and renew the self-giving love and the for-better-and-for-worse commitment of the marriage vows.  But the body language of contraceptive behaviors say, “I take you for better but positively not for the imagined ‘worse’ of possible pregnancy.”  They contradict the marriage covenant and are thus dishonest and immoral.

2.  Some forms of birth control contradict God’s plan for taking care of our health.  
Good health is a great gift from God, and we are obliged to take reasonable efforts to take care of it.  The birth control pill increases a woman’s risks of suffering breast cancer.  Compared to women who never use the Pill, a woman who uses the Pill increases her risk of breast cancer by 44% if she ever uses it, and it increases her risks by 52% if she uses it for four or more years before her first full-term pregnancy. (C. Kahlenborn, FM Modugno, and others, “Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2006:81(10):1290-1302.)  The WHO has labeled the birth control chemicals as a Group 1 carcinogen—the most dangerous classification.  Who is anti-woman—the people who want to foist this carcinogen on unsuspecting teenagers or the Church which teaches its people not to use contraception?

3.  Contraception contradicts what Jesus teaches us about marriage.
Jesus clearly teaches us in Scripture and in his Church that God has created the state of marriage.  When questioned about divorce, Jesus put it very simply:  “What God has put together, let no one take apart.”  That also applies to the marriage act.
Who put together the procreative and the unitive aspects of the marriage act?  Every believer has to say, “God Himself put together these two aspects in the marriage act.”
What is contraception except the effort to take apart what God Himself has joined in the marriage act?  There’s no getting around it—that’s what contraception is all about.

What’s the moral and healthy and effective alternative?
Natural family planning.
1.  Systematic NFP can be used at the 99% level of effectiveness for postponing pregnancy.   Among less-fertile couples it can be very helpful for achieving pregnancy.
2.  Ecological breastfeeding naturally spaces babies—on average about two years apart.
St. Lawrence parish regularly conducts NFP courses so that you can have the positive and healthy alternatives to unnatural forms of birth control.   For more information, see www.nfpandmore.org.

Our pastor, Fr. Mark Watkins, asked John Kippley to write this for his church bulletin.  This insert appeared in the April 4, 2012 St. Lawrence Church Sunday bulletin.

Birth Control Opposition in Protestant Churches

Sunday, May 13th, 2012

From an email message to my husband:

I’m a Pro-Life Catholic convert as of a few years ago, and would like to talk to Protestants, as someone who understands them, about Birth Control.  But, I don’t know of a single Protestant denomination that opposes birth control, do you? Or do you know of even a single Protestant church that teaches opposition to birth control?  Let me know.

I have dedicated my life to LIFE. I became a Catholic mostly for that reason from being a lifetime Protestant.  John, there is no subject on earth, and never has been more important than protecting and promoting life, because it is the premier way to serve the Father, Son and Holy Spirit….

Hey, I’m not even happy about the approval by the Catholic Church of “Natural” Birth Control. I see no biblical, or Church tradition, that supports it. Maybe there is something somewhere, but I have never found it. Maybe you could enlighten me on that as well. I feel that our stance on “Natural Family Planning” undermines our Pro-Life message considerably. Maybe you could inform me how what I surmise is not true. I’ve read and studied Humanae Vitae repeatedly and am still puzzled.
Founder

JOHN’S RESPONSE:

Dear Founder,
I am not aware of any Protestant denomination or geographic church that opposes unnatural forms of birth control, but that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.  In my booklet, “Birth Control and Christian Discipleship,” you will find several anti-birth-control quotations from Protestant leaders in response to the acceptance of contraception by the Federal Council of Churches in 1931.  And just last year or in 2010, the president of the big Baptist seminary in St. Louis said some things much more favorable to Catholic teaching on this issue and critical of the massive and unthinking Protestant acceptance starting in 1931.

Until the middle of the 19th century, there was no alternative between contraception and non-contraceptive pregnancy-avoiding strategies.  The idea of a limited fertile time in the female cycle didn’t occur to scientists until about 1850, and the Vatican rather quickly approved the concept of periodic abstinence during the fertile time.  The reality didn’t come about for another 80 years.

I suggest that you read our NFP manual to get a balanced approach.  Most of what counts on this subject is in Chapter 1.  We encourage couples to use ecological breastfeeding as a natural baby spacer.  If and when the time comes that they have a sufficiently serious reason to avoid pregnancy, that’s the time to use systematic NFP.

At the top of the first page of each chapter you will find a quotation that adds flesh to the teaching of Humanae Vitae.

Thanks for writing.  Hope to hear from you again.

Peace,
John Kippley

P.S.  This is the month of May which is traditionally thought of as a special Marian month and thus a time to emphasize praying the rosary.  I have compiled an expanded rosary title The Seven Day Bible Rosary: Different Mysteries for each day of the week.  I have found that converts have a particular appreciation for this form of praying the rosary. To find out more, visit www.sevendaybiblerosary.com .

HHS Mandate and Reflections

Sunday, February 26th, 2012

With regard to fighting the mandate, I agree that at one level the emphasis has to be on the First Amendment.  But I also think that we need to do what we can to point out that giving hormonal birth control is not good medicine. And we need to point out also that the claim to a right to free birth control is simply an outrageous example of the entitlement attitude that is sinking this country economically.

I think we need to recognize that this is in large part due to 43 years of ecclesiastical neglect of conscience formation regarding these issues.  I think it is entirely possible that Mr. Obama and Mrs. Sibelius have never met a fertile-age married person who actually believes and lives by what the Church teaches regarding marital love and sexuality.  (Okay, so they know Rick Santorum.)   But they are certainly aware of the statistics at the USCCB website that show that fertile-age Catholics are overwhelmingly in favor of the birth control practices they want to mandate.

Back in the Seventies or Eighties I was accused by a priest in another diocese of teaching against the bishops because I was critical of their still keeping archdissenter Fr. Charles Curran at CUA.  (Pope John Paul II finally forced his removal after 19 years.)

Sheila and I started an NFP course on February 8 at St. Lawrence parish here in Cincinnati.  I sent announcements to every parish in the city.  We had four registrations, all engaged couples at St. Lawrence, thanks to Father Watkins making the course a normal part of preparation for marriage.  At least 90% of fertile-age church-going Catholics are using unnatural forms of birth control; only 1.1% are using some form of systematic NFP.  This is well known.  The donation for our course is the cheapest in the area (half of what another teaching couple charges), so money can’t be the reason.

In NFPI we do not teach “Catholic birth control.  We try to teach generosity.  We promote and teach ecological breastfeeding, and where else are local engaged couples going to hear this today?  That alone should be sufficient reason for our priests to insist that their engaged couples take the NFPI course.

I certainly agree that we need to support our bishops in this battle against the HHS mandate.  While most fertile-age Catholics are already using unnatural forms of birth control, and while most Catholic doctors and medical practices are already doing what HHS wants, it is another thing entirely to be forced to do these things.

The time has come for our bishops, priests and deacons to realize that they can no longer ignore, for all practical purposes, the teaching of Humanae Vitae.  They need to provide practical motivation, and they need to realize that the practical and theological help we have been offering for 40 years (yes, 41 come this fall) is first rate even though dirt cheap.
_________________
A public response to John:

I completely agree with you, John! I was out in the schools–Catholic and public–teaching abstinence for 5 years. It was a hard road. I was involved in high school youth ministry at my parish for 17 years, mainly on the spiritual retreats. We mostly had the “cream of the crop”–those who wanted to get closer to God. Lots of them Catholic. They didn’t really want to hear the abstinence message either. Most of them didn’t understand why the boys had separate sleeping quarters from the girls and why one wasn’t allowed in the other’s sleeping area or why opposites weren’t allowed in each other’s sleeping bags! Girls “spooning” with guys was totally OK with them. Just look at how women–adolescents and on up–dress for Mass or better yet for their weddings!

I know from this experience, that abortion won’t end until modesty and morality return; and at this point, that has to start in the pulpit. It’s time for all religious–sisters, brothers, deacons, priests, etc–to stop worrying about offending their congregation and quake in their boots over the souls that are being lost to sin because of their sin of pride for the praise of men. If the world loves you, it is because it doesn’t love God. If you are going to stand in for Jesus–EXPECT TO NOT BE LIKED AND TO BE PERSECUTED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!  It was hard for me, I didn’t like it. Lots of times I felt like Jeremiah, but I knew what I was responsible for and who I would be answering to if I didn’t tell them the truth.

Their outrage is 20 years too late. So I’m praying for the Bishops–mostly that God has mercy on their souls.
_______________

Other comments by John regarding the mandate.
“What editors and the readers need to see is that hormonal birth control is bad news because it increases the risks of several diseases–breast cancer included.  To foist this on unsuspecting teenagers is simply evil. ”

“I would add one more factor.  Regardless of the demerits or merits of any kind of birth control, the choice is a personal one.  Taxpayers should not be picking up the tab for personal choices which are essentially a matter of personal responsibility.  And I would say the same thing about Viagra-type drugs.  Reining in the cost of health care has to start someplace, and it seems to me that personal choice items simply have to go.”

For the dangers of taking the birth control pill, read the Lanfranchi and Brind online booklet on breast cancer at the NFPI website.

John F. Kippley
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive