Archive for the ‘NFP’ Category

7. Ecological Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Friday, August 7th, 2015

Conclusions.

1. When teaching about breastfeeding and its relationship with natural baby spacing, it is imperative to distinguish the types of breastfeeding. The kind of breastfeeding that is common in Western culture provides very little postponement of the return of fertility and is not associated with natural baby spacing.

2. Ecological Breastfeeding IS a form of natural baby spacing. The Seven Standards of ecological breastfeeding are maternal behaviors associated with an extended breastfeeding amenorrhea, a time without menstruation after childbirth. The two key factors are mother-baby togetherness and frequent and unrestricted suckling. For an ecologically breastfeeding mother to go one or two years without menstruation is perfectly normal. To experience breastfeeding amenorrhea beyond two years is not abnormal and is typical in some cultures.

3. Every woman and every man have a God-given right to learn the wonderful health benefits that God has built into the breastfeeding relationship and how these are maximized through ecological breastfeeding.  Ecological breastfeeding offers many benefits to both mother and baby, even years later after the breastfeeding has ceased. In the NFP International user’s manual, Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach, you will find a list of 21 very specific health advantages for babies plus another six general advantages such as fewer sick days and higher scores on cognitive and IQ tests at school age. You will also find two lists of advantages for breastfeeding mothers.

More benefits of breastfeeding are discovered every year. At the website of NFP International, in the upper right corner for “blogs”, you can find the Breastfeeding Research articles for the years 2013 and 2014.

4. Every woman and every man have a basic God-given right to know about the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding. This option should be taught to older students and couples world-wide, especially in the Catholic Church.

5. Because natural birth spacing through ecological breastfeeding is important for the well-being of babies and mothers, the Catholic Church should be insisting that every engaged couple learn about ecological breastfeeding well before they are married. When couples realize the benefits of mother-baby togetherness, this can influence some of the decisions they make. To afford living on one income after the first baby comes, they may decide to live in a lower priced house and to buy less expensive furniture.  No one can force such decisions, but if they want to do what is best for their children, many well informed couples might order their priorities accordingly.

6. Ecological Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Thursday, August 6th, 2015

The year 1986 saw two publications on breastfeeding and natural child spacing. Both researchers concluded that the most important factor for extended breastfeeding amenorrhea is night feeding associated with bed sharing between mother and baby.

In the 1990s Dr. William Taylor studied the frequency of breastfeeding and infertility and concluded that it is the short intervals between feedings that delays ovulation. Mothers who nursed with long feedings and long intervals between feedings tended to ovulate earlier. Those mothers who nursed frequently with shorter intervals between feedings were more likely to ovulate later. His 72 American mothers who tended to follow the more natural pattern of breastfeeding averaged 14 months of postpartum infertility.

In 1999, Dr. Taylor found that in one of his study groups, the “median waiting time to first menses was 12.8 months.” In this paper he drew this conclusion: “Stated positively, when babies (1) sleep with the mother, (2) are held close to the mother’s body, and (3) accompany her everywhere, the resulting easy access to the breast may be a causative factor in the ecology of breast-feeding’s contraceptive effect.”  

However, sometimes not everything that is found in a study is published. In personal correspondence, Dr. Taylor gave us some further refined results regarding this study. He wrote: “When we eliminated [from our study results] mothers who returned to work outside the home, did not let their baby sleep with them at night, introduced solids before six months and nursed less than a median of 9 times a day in the first three months, we ended up with a group that might be said to follow the natural mothering norm. For these 55 mothers the median wait to their first menses was 15.9 months.”

Just as the reproductive cycle is at rest during pregnancy, the reproductive cycle is also at rest for a lengthy period of time during breastfeeding – if you take nature as the norm. Sheila remembers well her favorite physiology teacher in high school stressing that the end of the reproductive cycle is not childbirth but breastfeeding. Unfortunately, many nursing mothers have their menstruation return soon after childbirth. But if you take nature as the norm, having menstruation return early is the exception. Extended breastfeeding infertility is the norm.

Someone might ask “How many mothers become pregnant before their first period?” In 1895, basically a non-contraceptive time, this question was researched by Dr. Leonard Remfry who reported that 5.77 percent of the women in his study became pregnant before a first postpartum menstruation. In 1969 a similar rate of 5.4% was found in Rwanda. In 1971, Dr. Konald A. Prem, a professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Minnesota, studied this question and found “only five percent” of his breastfeeding mothers became pregnant before a first menstruation. The studies of Dr. Remfry and Dr. Prem are available at the website of NFP International.

From July 19th to the evening of August 7th (NFP Awareness Week through World Breastfeeding Week) anyone can purchase the following printed books at a 40% discount at lulu:
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach (coil edition preferred for learners)
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive
Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

5. Ecological Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Wednesday, August 5th, 2015

Here is some of the natural baby spacing research in certain areas of the world. Among the Canadian Eskimos, traditional breastfeeding spaced births naturally. Conception, not childbirth, occurred at 20 to 30 months postpartum due to traditional breastfeeding. When the trading posts came to the Canadian Eskimos, the Eskimo mothers were introduced to the bottle. The use of the bottle among breastfeeding Eskimo mothers reduced the frequency and duration of breastfeeding, and these mothers were now conceiving 2 to 4 months after childbirth.  In fact, the closer the mothers lived to the trading posts, the sooner their babies came. They completely lost the natural spacing they previously had through traditional breastfeeding.

Dr. Otto Schaefer, one of the two doctors who did much of the fertility research among the Canadian Eskimos, attended an Eskimo women’s conference, and it was the first time he heard the mothers complaining because babies were coming rather quickly. With traditional breastfeeding, babies were well spaced and families averaged 3 to 4 children.  From this experience, Dr. Schaefer taught that 1) “breastfeeding had a greater influence on the life and health of infants than any other single factor,” and 2) that “the traditional Inuit custom of breastfeeding until the age of three years…provided an effective type of birth control,” and 3) that “lactation allowed for a desirable spacing of children.”  

Dr. Schaefer published in 1971, and our first work was published in 1972. A number of studies have corroborated these findings.

In a 1974 Rwanda study, different groups of breastfeeding mothers had different conception rates. In the rural areas 75% of breastfeeding women conceived between 24 and 29 months postpartum, while in the city 75% of the mothers were conceiving between 6 and 15 months postpartum. According to the researchers, the reason the rural mothers conceived much later was due to the fact that they remained with their babies while the city mothers were developing nursing patterns closer to Western cultural nursing and leaving their babies with others.

In 1976 Dr. R. V. Short of Scotland stated: “Throughout the world as a whole, more births are prevented by lactation than all other forms of contraception put together.”  He continued his studies of certain tribes and mammals and in 1984 concluded that frequent nursing is the norm, that is, that the frequent suckling stimulus is the “crucial” factor for postpartum infertility.

In 1980 Konner and Worthman reported that a tribe living in the Kalahari Desert in southern Africa had a natural birth spacing of 44 months due to their mothering and frequent nursing pattern. On average, the mothers in this study were conceiving 35 months postpartum. The babies of this non-contraceptive tribe remained physically close to their mothers day and night during their first two years. The researchers concluded that frequent breastfeeding was the likely key to the child spacing of these people.

In 1985, Dr. James Wood at the University of Michigan’s Population Studies Center studied a New Guinea people, the Gainj, where the child nursed day and night and always slept with his mother. The breastfeeding episodes were short and frequent. These people did not practice contraception or abortion. Their average birth interval was 44 months with an average family size of 4.3 children.

From July 19th to the evening of August 7th (NFP Awareness Week through World Breastfeeding Week) anyone can purchase the following printed books at a 40% discount at lulu:
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach (coil edition preferred for learners)
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive
Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing