Archive for the ‘NFP’ Category

Natural Family Planning: Love and Life are Inseparable

Sunday, February 8th, 2015

Below is an excerpt on natural family planning from Fr. Dwight Campbell’s pro-life homily showing the connection of contraception and abortion, January 18, 2015.

“January 22 marks the 42nd anniversary of the dreadful Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, which overturned every state law in the country and permitted the killing of unborn children through abortion throughout the full nine months of pregnancy. Since that decision, between 55 and 60 million pre-born children have been killed in the womb – a veritable American Holocaust which still continues.

A few months ago Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, the chairman of the U.S. Bishops committee on pro-life activities, reported under the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare), more than 1000 healthcare plans in our country now receive federal subsidies that cover for elective abortions – which means that our taxes dollars are being used by the federal government to kill unborn babies.

How did this happen? How did it come about that we, a largely Christian nation, have killed close to one third of all the children conceived in the womb over the past 42 years? In today’s homily, I’d like to “connect the dots” – that is, paint a picture and explain how we arrived at this point in our country.

To understand what has happened, we must go back to God’s plan for love, life, marriage and the family. In our 2nd reading today, St. Paul teaches: “Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ, and whoever is joined to the Lord becomes on Spirit with him. [Therefore,] avoid immorality. . . the immoral person sins against his own body (1 Cor. 6:15 ff.).”  This applies above all in marriage.

In God’s plan for the marriage act, there is an inseparable link between love and life – between the unitive, or love-giving aspect of the marital act, and the procreative, or life-giving aspect. This is because we are made in God’s image and likeness, and in God Himself – the three persons of the Trinity – love and life are inseparable: God’s love is always life-giving; and human love, marital love, is intended by God to reflect divine love.

In other words, in the marital act there must be a total gift of self between the spouses; husband and wife cannot hold anything back, including their fertility. Every marital act must remain open to the possibility of cooperating with God’s life-creating love, and generating new human life:  a child. Vatican II teaches that in God’s plan, “authentic married love is caught up into divine love” (GS no. 48).

In God’s plan, because love and life are inseparable, one cannot have authentic marital love without openness to human life; and this is why the Church prohibits artificial birth control – whether it be contraception or sterilization.

If couples have a serious reason for postponing a pregnancy, they may use a natural means to do so. Natural Family Planning is based upon knowledge of a woman’s monthly reproductive cycle, and requires periodic abstinence – which actually helps to strengthen authentic love between spouses. When couples use NFP, every marital act remains open to life and to God’s potentially life-creating love.

To intentionally exclude the procreative aspect of marital love by some artificial means really de-forms the marital act, rendering it life-less, thereby excluding God from participating in the act. Contraceptive sex is lifeless sex, and lifeless sex is Godless sex.

Archbishop Listecki, in his “Love One Another” article from July 16, 2013, said:  “The contraceptive mentality attempts to separate the act of lovemaking from procreating. There is little doubt in my mind that contraception has created a type of selfishness, especially in the lives of young married couples. The child is seen as an afterthought to their security or convenience. Large families, and for many that is more than two children in a family, are often treated as an archaic concept.”

As Pope St. John Paul II teaches in his encyclical The Gospel of Life, when the two meanings of sexual relations, unitive and procreative, are artificially separated by contraception or sterilization, “the marriage union is betrayed and its fruitfulness is subjected to the caprice of the couple. Procreation then becomes the ‘enemy’ to be avoided in sexual activity” (no. 23).

And it is precisely this anti-child, anti-life mentality of contraception that leads to abortion. St. John Paul II makes this clear in The Gospel of Life when he says:  “The close connection, in mentality, between the practice of contraception and abortion is becoming increasingly obvious” (no. 13). I like to call abortion the “flip side” of contraception; people use contraception to avoid a child, and when contraception fails, as it often does, the “solution” is the “final solution”:  abort the child.

The great pro-life missionary, Fr. Paul Marx, O.S.B. – for whom I was privileged to work for two years while I was in the seminary – visited close to 100 countries preaching the pro-life message. Fr. Marx said, many times, “I never visited a country where there was with nice, clean contraception, and no abortion. In any country where there was contraception, there was always abortion. Always.”

Above is the first half of the homily.  For the full homily by Fr. Campbell, you may listen to the audio.
____________
For a good analysis of the right kind of natural family planning, review  “Your Right to Know.”  More information on love, marriage and sexuality is also available at the NFPI website.
Sheila Kippley

Natural Family Planning and Dr. Konald A. Prem

Sunday, February 1st, 2015

Dr. Konald Prem, the physician so helpful to us in our founding and for many years, died January 25, 2015.  Below is 1) a brief statement John sent for his obituary.  This will be followed by 2) a brief comment from me and 3) John’s writing about his work with natural family planning in Battle-Scarred.

John’s brief statement:
Dr. Konald A. Prem, as a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and serving a term as department head, was the highest ranking doctor in American (and perhaps the world) to be actively involved in the American natural family planning movement.  He was the first American doctor to study breastfeeding and natural baby spacing among American mothers, finding that only 5% of his breastfeeding mothers became pregnant before their first period.  That interest led him to use his expertise in the development of a natural family planning organization, the Couple to Couple League, in 1971.  His work has been a service to married couples and to the Catholic Church and is now carried on by Natural Family Planning International headquartered in Steubenville, Ohio.

Sheila:  Dr. Konald Prem’s research paper on breastfeeding infertility is available at our website at http://www.nfpandmore.org/Postpartum_ovulation_prem.pdf.  He regretted that he did not seek publication of his paper when he completed it in the early Seventies.  He also saw ovulation occurring when he was doing surgery but unfortunately did not have a camera recording this event.  Dr. Prem had a strong interest in helping breastfeeding mothers with natural family planning.  For example, a very active La Leche League leader had conceived once in the early postpartum months during amenorrhea, and she wanted to use natural family planning to avoid this happening again.  With her next baby she became concerned as to whether she was fertile or not.  He encouraged her to come in, checked internally, found long stretchy mucus which he showed her and said it would be wise to abstain at this time.  Because of Dr. Prem’s work with breastfeeding mothers and our work to help breastfeeding mothers, we made a good team.

Excerpt from John’s memoirs, Battle-Scarred:
One of the first things we arranged was a meeting with Dr. Konald A. Prem with whom Sheila was scheduled to conduct a panel on breastfeeding and natural child spacing at the La Leche League’s convention in Chicago that summer. Sheila and he needed to clarify who was going to talk about what. Dr. Prem was, at the time, a full professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Minnesota Medical School, and he had researched breastfeeding infertility. (He never published his research, but it is now at www.nfpandmore.org.) He was a Catholic who accepted the teaching of Humanae Vitae, and he had years of experience with a temperature-based form of natural family planning (NFP). In 1968 he had published in Child and Family a detailed explanatory article on NFP, and it was one of our main sources of self-instruction on systematic natural family planning when we were in Canada.

After Dr. Prem and Sheila had completed their discussion about the breastfeeding panel, we asked him if he would be interested in helping us form an organization to teach NFP using trained user-couples as the teachers. He was aware of failed clinic and hospital programs, so he was immediately enthusiastic, saying that this concept was precisely what was needed for long-term teaching and support of user-couples. Both he and we were aware of the success of La Leche League and its use of volunteer breastfeeding mothers to spread the word and provide excellent support. What we proposed would follow the LLL model, and it proved to be an excellent working model.

La Leche League International held a huge conference in July 1971 at a hotel in downtown Chicago, and Sheila was privileged to be a panel presenter with Dr. Prem and Dr. Paul Busam of Cincinnati. As I write these pages, we are still in regular contact with Dr. Prem whom I last visited in the summer of 2009, and we have dinner with Dr. Busam once a month. Each
year I try to phone Dr. Prem with birthday greetings—easy to remember since we share the same birthday, just ten years apart.

The conference was successful on all counts. The adults were pleased with the presentation by Princess Grace of Monaco and by actress Susan St. James who was giving a new and popular face to breastfeeding, and our kids were thrilled when white-suited Col. Sanders of Kentucky Fried Chicken stopped by our table to say “Hi” to them.

We started to teach natural family planning as part of the parish adult education program, and we can still remember the first class that fall. It was held in the parish library, and almost nobody was there at the appointed starting time. We decided to wait a bit, and within ten minutes there were about a dozen couples, more than enough so that we didn’t feel we were just talking to ourselves. Our teaching notes consisted of a few pages of handwriting. Our audio-visuals were just ourselves, although we may have had a chalkboard.

The course was simple but complete, consisting of four two-hour classes. Sheila would teach the aspects dealing with ecological breastfeeding, and I would deal with matters of faith and morals. Dr. Prem had already had a hard day of work and suffered from narcolepsy, so he snoozed in the back of the room as we talked, but when it was his turn to teach the Sympto-Thermal Method, he was refreshed and as sharp as ever. He came to each class of the two courses we taught, and for some time he continued to come to the classes taught by our new teachers in the Twin Cities.

Dr. Prem always stayed after class to help couples with the interpretation of their charts, but he did not use standardized Phase 3 rules as we do today. With his wide experience, he would simply tell the couples if they were now in pre-ovulation infertility, or the fertile time, or when Phase 3, the time of post-ovulation infertility, had begun. He would also tell them with great confidence that if he was wrong about a Phase 3 interpretation, he would deliver the baby free of charge. He also told them that no one had ever taken him up on that offer. We looked over his shoulder and not infrequently would ask him how he arrived at his interpretations. By listening to his explanations, we gradually developed the several rules that we still use today. The occasion of one of his interpretations still stays with me. At the end of the meeting, a couple who had been unable to get to the class on time dashed into the room. They wanted an interpretation, and when Dr. Prem told them they were in Phase 3, the wife raised the chart and cried out for all to hear, “Fun city tonight!” while her husband’s face turned beet-red.
________________
He is missed.  May he rest in peace.

John and Sheila Kippley

Natural Family Planning and Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, January 25th, 2015

The language that Pope Francis used about family size certainly got attention, but the Church has always taught that a couple does not have to seek to have as many children as they can have, biologically speaking.  As soon as there was scientific speculation that women, like many other mammals, have periodic fertility, the Vatican stated that it would be legitimate for a couple to abstain during the fertile time of the cycle in order to avoid pregnancy—and that was in 1850. The Church teaches that a couple can use systematic natural family planning if they have a sufficiently serious reason.  Such reasons are given in Humanae Vitae.

The Pope also referred to natural family planning which today is highly effective when understood and practiced by couples who have a real need to avoid pregnancy, especially if they use a system that cross-checks two of the fertility signs.

Much has also been made of the Pope’s reference that humans should not produce like rabbits.  In the old days, two babies born within a 12-month span sometimes were called “Catholic twins.”  What is not mentioned in all the discussions on this topic is that God has a plan for spacing our children’s births.  A physiology teacher in the Fifties taught in her high school class that the reproductive cycle ends with breastfeeding.  She was a wonderful teacher.  Of course, as one of her students, I did not fully understand what that all meant.  Unfortunately today everyone assumes that the reproductive cycle ends with childbirth.  Not so, if you take nature as your norm.  Repeated research has shown that mothers who practice ecological breastfeeding experience, on average, 14 to 15 months of breastfeeding amenorrhea (no periods), some less and some much more.

We are the only American NFP organization that teaches the Seven Standards of ecological breastfeeding, a form of natural mothering that spaces babies.  The Seven Standards are simply maternal behaviors associated with extended breastfeeding amenorrhea. For example, no bottles, no formula, no pacifiers, no babysitting, no strict schedules, and more.  See the Seven Standards.  The key is mother-baby closeness and frequent suckling.  Some mothers may not be able to practice eco-breastfeeding for various reasons; but among those who do, their appreciation is frequently huge.

World and Church leaders should promote ecological breastfeeding whenever natural family planning is discussed.  Couples should be able to learn this option for planning their families.
_________
Witness: “The Kippleys’ teaching about ecological breastfeeding was instrumental to my conversion, not only to the fullness of Church teaching on marriage, but to the Catholic faith itself.  I was a 30-something, “childless-by-choice”, nominal Protestant when I encountered it and my heart was so changed that I became Catholic within a year, AND became pregnant with my first child.  My husband and I used ONLY ecological breastfeeding to space our three children going forward, and our marriage and family life has been immeasurably enriched.  Bishops who encourage this teaching are truly evangelizing in a desperately needed way in today’s world.” Pamela Pilch
_________
Another witness:  “Since our marriage, my husband and I have used ecological breastfeeding to space our 6 children, you guessed it, 2-3 years apart.  I hope to further your work to share ecological breastfeeding with the world!”  She adds the benefits:  “no menstrual bleeding, no cramps, migraines, PMS, or pads; and no ovulations—for years on end.  My husband and I have been free of what others call the “fear” of pregnancy, that is, free to enjoy each other intimately for years without any concerns or even [a] thought given to preventing pregnancy.  No potentially contentious discussions about whether to try for another baby.  No need to chart.  No need to take temps.  Simply letting God plan our family.  By the time my fertility has returned, we have been mentally in the place where another pregnancy and another baby seemed….well…natural!” Christelle Hagen
___________
Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding