Archive for the ‘NFP’ Category

Natural Family Planning and the Temperature Sign

Sunday, November 24th, 2019

The temperature sign is simple to use and a great option for couples.  As one couple told us last month, October 2019, “Prepregnancy, my husband and I primarily relied upon the thermal method, due to its simplicity.”

In the 1970s, my husband attended Fr. Paul Marx’s conferences on natural family planning and heard Dr. Billings say he dropped the temperature because women found the temperature sign so easy to use that they tended to ignore the mucus sign.

In our Home Study Course, we give the couple a pregnancy chart to interpret.  We want them to learn that the three weeks of elevated temps indicate pregnancy.  When they give the right answer, that the chart indicates pregnancy, I tell them that we picked the pregnancy chart for a reason.  This chart is to teach you that the temperature sign is an excellent indicator of pregnancy and also of the age of the unborn baby.  Our primary medical consultant called 3 weeks of elevated temps the best indicator for the estimated date of childbirth.  You do not have to run out and buy pregnancy kits or age-of-unborn-baby kits.  The chart gives you the answer.  See page 70 in the manual for the details.

In addition, the temperature sign can also tell you when you are not pregnant.  For example, when a very worried woman called about a possible pregnancy while using only the mucus sign, we told her to take her temp for five days and get back to us.  From those temps, we could assure her she was most likely not pregnant, assuming that her temperature pattern was in the range typical for most women.  This gave her peace of mind, and a subsequent menstruation confirmed our estimation.

For more information and research on the temperature sign, go to “Your Right to Know” on the home page or to http://www.nfpandmore.org/pdf/temperature_sign.pdf.

Sheila Kippley

Natural Family Planning: The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, November 17th, 2019

Many of my friends and readers have enjoyed the natural spacing of births through Ecological Breastfeeding.  Many engaged couples who take the NFPI Home Study Course learn about eco-breastfeeding for the first time.  Unfortunately, Natural Family Planning International is the only NFP organization in our country that promotes and teaches Ecological Breastfeeding.

Perhaps that’s because many people, even in places of influence, still do not believe that breastfeeding spaces babies.  I wrote The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding for such folks.  Each chapter is devoted to one Standard and presents independent research for that Standard.  The book is inexpensive and is an easy read.  In Cincinnati we give this book free to those who attend the NFPI classes.  We encourage you to purchase the book for yourself or for others, and especially for those involved with marriage preparation.

The late Miriam Labbok, a researcher of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method, told me she read the book, The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding, in one night and took the book with her where ever she went.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor

 

Natural Family Planning: Opposition to Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, November 10th, 2019

The organization we founded n 1971 developed a new NFP program a few years after our separation and dropped the three basic teachings that we brought to this organization.  One reason given for not teaching ecological breastfeeding was that many of the medical professionals had not heard of eco-breastfeeding.  That, of course, could be said about the symptom thermal method.

Another reason given was that mothers felt guilty if their periods returned early.  I did a survey in that organization among those mothers who said that eco-breastfeeding did not work for them.  None were following all of the Seven Standards.  Secondly, we taught eco-breastfeeding since 1971 and no one complained if their menses returned early post-partum.  We also stated that you grow in parenting and showed how we changed in our form of baby-care between baby #1 and baby #2.

A few say that we teach eco-breastfeeding just for spacing, and that we are teaching couples how not to have babies. That’s a serious misunderstanding.  We state over and over the many benefits for mother and baby.  Natural birth spacing is just one of those benefits.  Right now my husband is on the bandwagon promoting breastfeeding for the environment because the British Medical Journal recently (Oct. 2) published an article against formula and its bad effect upon the environment.  Alternatively, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months was strongly endorsed.

Most importantly, we teach couples through Scripture and papal talks that they are called to be generous in having children.  Compared to other NFP organizations, I believe we are an exception in strongly teaching generosity.  As one person said about the NFP organizations:  “The “emphasis should not be on how we can morally restrict the size of our family, but on how we can open our hearts and allow our families to grow.”

Some mothers have specific health reasons for breastfeeding according to the Seven Standards.  One reason would be breast cancer among female family members.  Another mother told us she had several women in her family who developed ovarian cancer.  She followed the Seven Standards in the hopes of avoiding ovarian cancer.  Is she to be criticized because she had one main reason for breastfeeding in a natural manner as part of God’s plan for her?

The most important benefit of following God’s plan for mother and baby through breastfeeding is the wonderful mother/baby relationship that develops and is so important during those early years.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding