Archive for the ‘Humanae Vitae’ Category

2. Humanae Vitae Dialogue: The People of God

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009

This is the second of several comments on an email dialogue with a gentleman who had, I think, the same orthodox Catholic education that I received at the Institute of Lay Theology in the early Sixties but who dissents from the teaching of Humanae Vitae.  In our conversation he would write statements such as these:  “You are dead wrong in your defense of rhythm and other sexist notions still held by a dwindling minority of the People of God” and “The People of God in large measure disagree with [Humanae Vitae].” 

The gist of this argument, that has been around since the beginning of the dissent in 1968, is that large numbers of Catholics can’t be wrong.  If you were to set it up as an argument, it would look like this.
       Major premise:  If a majority of Catholics believe something, such numbers prove  that their position is the work of the Holy Spirit and therefore true.
       Minor premise:  A majority of Catholics today believe that it is morally okay for them to use unnatural forms of birth control.
       Conclusion:  Therefore, the teaching of Humanae Vitae is not binding.

The only true part of that argument is the minor premise.  The major premise is false; it could never be proven, and it is diametrically opposed to the Biblical treatment of the People of God. 

The People of God were first organized by Moses.  Prior to that time, they were the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and their tribal descendants.  Immediately after Moses delivered them from the slavery of Egypt and through the Red Sea, there was great rejoicing, but that soon turned to grumbling, rebellion, and the building of a golden calf to which they rendered homage.  According to the dissenters’ way of thinking, Moses must have been wrong.  The vast majority were against him.  Moses, however, had some more conversation with Almighty God.  He repeated the Commandments.  The conclusion is that God and one prophet make a majority.  It’s the same today.

St. Paul commented on this in 1 Corinthians 10:1-5.  He reviewed the great events of the Exodus — they had all been led through the sea and had all eaten of the supernatural food and drink.  “Nevertheless with most of them God was not pleased.” 

In Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality, I review the dissenters’ position much more thoroughly and provide multiple examples from the contemporary People of God to illustrate the error of the dissenting position.  The more you look at the People of God with all of its weaknesses and self-interest, the more ridiculous the dissenters’ argument becomes.  Once again, God has used a reluctant prophet, the Pope, to tell the People what they really didn’t want to hear.  Once again, God and one prophet make a majority. 

Just about your last chance.  Let me remind you that Sex and the Marriage Covenant is normally priced at $17.95, and with 428 pages, that’s a buy today.  Ignatius Press is having a huge August sale, so it’s currently available for only $5.00.  Hurry.  This sale lasts only through August 31.  Sex and the Marriage Covenant costs less than a good hamburger, and it’s got meat that will last you for years.

Next week: Humanae Vitae dialogue on eco-breastfeeding

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant

1. Humanae Vitae dialogue with a dissenter

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

During the last half of July, I had an interesting dialogue with a gentleman who received the same orthodox Catholic education I did at the Institute of Lay Theology (ILT) in the early Sixties.  This was a one-year program to prepare parish lay evangelists.  The occasion of our dialogue was an invitation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the founding of ILT in 1959. 

     The celebration day will have a two-hour panel of seven presentations, followed by another couple hours of discussion, etc.  The program is titled The Greening of the Good News and each presentation is titled “The Good News and such-and-such.”  Since there was nothing titled “The Good News and Humanae Vitae,” I wrote to call attention to this omission.  My correspondent replied that he regarded it as Bad News, and he noted a few other Catholic teachings from which he dissents.

     We went back and forth a half dozen times or so.  Early on he made gratuitous assertions such as “If I am not mistaken, you go to the Catholic Church to be saved. I, on the other hand, go to the Catholic Church to save it (especially the pope).”   A modest fellow is he. 

     Later he offered his arguments for dissenting from Humanae Vitae, and these were truly surprising.  It was déjà vu, the 1960s all over again.  These were the arguments that were making the rounds before and after Humanae Vitae.  These and a lot more were the arguments I answered in my first book, Covenant, Christ and Contraception published by Alba House in 1970.  I could scarcely believe that these arguments were still floating around.  This fact is a good selling point for reading that book in its updated and expanded version, Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality now published by Ignatius. 

     I’m going to be addressing some of his arguments in the next few blogs, but first let me make an impassioned plea for you to buy the book on the cheap.  Sheila and I went to dinner Friday night at a little place we had seen a few days earlier.  We were a bit surprised by the prices and even more surprised by the poor quality of one of the entrees.  We put out $29.05 including tip for a dinner that was worth hardly half that much and I got thinking.  We dropped twenty-nine bucks for a lousy dinner that left us only a bad memory and a bunch of calories and some vitamins.  But when people look at a book for half that much, they seem to have a very hard time parting with cash for a book that will last a long time, and it’s something you might keep going back to repeatedly for answers to questions that arise from our social environment. 

     Right now you can get a book that addresses all the key questions in the birth control controversy at a real bargain.  Ignatius is having a big August sale.  Normally priced at $17.95, Sex and the Marriage Covenant is NOW ON SALE FOR ONLY $5.00.  You need to get it directly from Ignatius, either by phone or online.  THIS OFFER IS GOOD ONLY THROUGH THE END OF AUGUST.  So hurry.  Buy two so you have one for lending. 

     Next week:  The “People of God” argument. How do you respond to those who say that the big numbers of Christians who use contraception reflects the work of the Holy Spirit?

 

John  F. Kippley

Sex and the Marriage Covenant

Humanae Vitae and the Prayer of Petition

Sunday, March 1st, 2009

Does anyone else ever have to remind himself or herself that we pray our prayers of petition because the Lord has told us to do so?  Bear with me as I explain my problem. 

If we are really conscious of being God’s creatures and that we would not exist if not for his creative power, then it is simply a matter of good manners, so to speak, to offer prayers of thanksgiving for life itself, for the saving work of the Lord Jesus, and for every other gift He has given us. 

If we are truly conscious of the infinite distance between God and us and if we give any heed to the first three Commandments of the Decalogue, the ones dealing with God Himself, then it only makes sense to offer prayers of adoration.  Given our underlying incompleteness, everyone worships someone or something.  St. Paul in Romans 1 speaks unhappily about those who “exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever!” (vs:25).  The common idols of today are sex and money.  It seems to me that a person doesn’t have to be particularly “churchy” to recognize these things and the need to make the worship of the living God our first priority. 

And if we recognize our sinfulness, it only makes sense to offer prayers and sacrifices in reparation for our sins

But what about prayers of petition?  In one sense, these come quite naturally to a person who recognizes God as God of the universe.  For example, we saw full churches for a few days immediately after the tragedy of 9-11.  On the other hand, and this is the problem that keeps coming back to me, the believer knows that God already knows infinitely better than we do what we need and what is good for us, whether that applies to us personally, or to our family, or to the nation or to the whole world.  So why do the writers of the New Testament and the Lord Jesus tell us to pray, and even to pray always?  It’s not as if we are going to tell God something He doesn’t already know.

In my opinion, our human need to offer the prayer of petition stems from two other basic human needs.  First, we need to acknowledge repeatedly that God is the Giver of all good gifts and that He has the power to bring good out of evil, to heal the sick, and to bring about the conversion of sinners.  At the same time, we need to recognize that He has his own timetable and that only He knows what is best for any individual person.  One person’s sickness may be the opportunity for others to grow in holiness by their generous service to the one in need. 

Second, we need to spend some time in prayer, including the prayer of petition.  By using our precious time in prayer, we demonstrate to God and to ourselves that we think that prayer is important.  Doesn’t our use of time tell God and ourselves and our loved ones what is really important to us?  For example, if Sunday recreation is more important to us than Sunday worship, doesn’t that send a message?  If we keep telling ourselves we don’t have any time for prayer, doesn’t that send a message to God and confirm other priorities in our own minds? 

Please take the time, even if only a few moments, to pray daily for a rebirth of chastity, for a stop to contraception and abortion, and for a culture of life.  This, of course, is implicitly also a prayer for the acceptance of Humanae Vitae and for the acceptance of systematic natural family planning when couples have a sufficiently serious reason to postpone or avoid pregnancy beyond the natural spacing of ecological breastfeeding.   

The Mass is the perfect prayer that encompasses all four forms of prayer.  It is called the Eucharistic Sacrifice.  “Eucharist” means thanksgiving.  The Mass starts with an acknowledgement of our sins; it is clearly a prayer of reparation for sin.  It is a prayer of adoration, and it is a prayer of petition.  The obligation to worship at Mass every Sunday and Holy Day of Obligation is for our benefit, not for God’s. 

Properly understood, worship at Mass is a great reality check that affirms our relationship with God.  That is, in reality, we ought to offer thanksgiving, adoration, reparation for our sins, and petition for all of our needs, both physical and spiritual. 

Lent is a wonderful time to worship at Mass every day if that is possible. 

Next week we will take a look at a “Prayer before Mass” that can help at least some of us to keep these four purposes of the Mass more clearly in our minds and intentions.  

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality