Archive for the ‘Ecological Breastfeeding’ Category

Natural Family Planning: Breastfeeding Spaces Babies

Thursday, August 1st, 2019

Ecological Breastfeeding spaces babies naturally.  No periodic abstinence is required for this form of Natural Family Planning. I first learned about this in 1964 and wanted to learn more.  I was excited to begin my research on natural child spacing in 1966 at the University of San Francisco Medical Center library.  I continued my research in 1968 at the public health department library in Regina, Saskatchewan.  For fun and for this series of blogs, I reviewed all the research I collected up through 1968.  Here are the totals:  1 study in 1895; 2 in the 1930s; 6 in the 1940s; 7 in the 1950s; and 14 from 1960-1968.  All these papers dealt with the effect of lactation upon the reproductive cycle.  These papers dealt with full or mixed breastfeeding, but none of them dealt with the maternal behaviors which we have found are important for natural spacing.  We teach these behaviors with the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding.  These Standards will be discussed soon in this series of blogs for World Breastfeeding Week.  The published research for each Standard or behavior required for natural spacing is in my book, The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor.  It is a short book, easy to read and costs little.  We give the book free to every couple who attends our local NFP classes in Cincinnati.

The daily blogs for this World Breastfeeding Week will focus on the research showing that a long absence from menstruation can occur for certain breastfeeding mothers.  Why?  Because a certain type of breastfeeding continues to keep the reproductive system at rest.

Because this information has been made available since 1969 through our books and our NFP apostolates, we are amazed that this information is ignored by most of those in the Natural Family Planning movement as well as by the Church and the government. 

In 1983, Daniel T. Halperin covered this topic for his master’s thesis:  “Infant Feeding in Honduras:  Mixed Feeding, Child Spacing and some Policy Implications.”  He was a strong promoter of natural birth spacing through breastfeeding.  He was exposed to parents and health workers in Honduras who laughed at the idea that breastfeeding could space babies.  “Neither of three family planning officials with whom I spoke believed that lactation had significant influence on fertility.”  Yet the women in Honduras said they would prefer “two years or more” spacing.  This culture, however, favored bottles, pacifiers, early solids, and practices which cause fertility to return early.  Most parents were Catholic and feared “the widely-reported physical dangers associated with birth-control pills, IUDs, injections, etc.”

Mr. Halperin stated that while technological contraceptive devices work “against God’s will,” lactation and its child spacing effect are forms of the natural carrying-out “of His will.”

Tomorrow.  Today we saw a Honduran culture where natural child spacing via breastfeeding was uncommon.  Tomorrow we will see a culture where traditional breastfeeding does indeed space babies.
Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding

 

Natural Family Planning and Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, July 7th, 2019

The USCCB Diocesan Development Plan has certain standards for teaching natural family planning. Below is John’s writing on the need to have the DDP Standards modified to include Ecological Breastfeeding and the merits of breastfeeding. Below are his written concerns to the director of the DDP.

  1. The Standards need to recognize that there are two distinct form of birth spacing—Ecological Breastfeeding and Systematic NFP.  The current definition of NFP does not include Ecological Breastfeeding, and thus it does not correspond to the full reality.
  2. In addition, the current Standard dealing with breastfeeding deals with it more as a charting problem than something to be encouraged and as the healthiest form of baby care.  Not only teachers but every client should know the tremendous health benefits of breastfeeding AND that the frequency of Ecological Breastfeeding actually DOES act as an abstinence-free natural baby spacer.

I am convinced that the Church has a responsibility to share in the public health effort to increase breastfeeding of any sort and secondly to extend its duration.  The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently came out with another effort to promote breastfeeding.  Also, a recent Dutch journal dealing with lung health opposed formula-feeding strongly for families with a history of asthma.  It speculated whether formula should be by prescription-only for such families.

And, if the Church has a responsibility to inform its members about the health benefits of breastfeeding, where can that be done better than in pre-marriage preparation and especially within a required NFP course?

John F. Kippley


Natural Family Planning: Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Sunday, June 9th, 2019

From a French mother:  I will always present your book [The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding] as a document that promotes breastfeeding as a wonderful way of mothering. It’s also a way for spacing babies, but this is a “collateral advantage!”  Here’s my own experience as a breastfeeding mother.  I followed the 7 standards (without knowing your book) not in order to space the birth of my babies (especially because I had my first daughter at 28 years old; thus quite late) but in order to succeed with my breastfeeding.  It has worked so well that my daughter, who is almost 4 years old, still suckles but only in the morning. I went 38 and a half months without menstruation!  My future  newborn is for February.  Our two children will be spaced 4 years apart. I know I gave my best for my first child.

An Italian mother sent me three breastfeeding surveys; her babies were born when she was ages 27, 30,and 33.  She did not follow the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding with her first baby and was working 30 hours a week.

With her second baby she cut back on her job (2 days a week; 5 hours each day).  She exclusively breastfed for 7 months and took a daily nap for 14 months.  The baby slept in a cot near her bed, then the baby was moved into the children’s room when a year old.  However the baby often ended up in the parents’ bed until age 30 months.  First menstruation occurred at 29 months+2 weeks followed by a pregnancy.

With baby #3, she practiced ecological breastfeeding.  A daily nap was still ongoing during this survey.  Baby slept in parents’ bed at night for 32 months.  Exclusive breastfeeding occurred for 6 months+2 weeks.  No bottles, no pacifiers, and no job.  The baby was left in the care of another person once a month at age 2.5 years when the mother had a dinner date with her husband.  First menstruation occurred at 37 months+4 days postpartum.  In her experiences she relied exclusively on breastfeeding amenorrhea; a child was always welcome.

Discussion:  Our society is unfamiliar with the natural spacing of babies via breastfeeding.  If you take nature or God’s natural plan as the norm, for a breastfeeding mother to go 1, 2 or 3 years without menstruation is perfectly normal.  Some mothers’ bodies are more influenced by the breastfeeding, and some are less influenced.  Whether a breastfeeding mother experiences one year postpartum without any menstruation or 3 years without menstruation….all these experiences are normal.

Because our society including many of our churches support mothers who work outside the home, the message of breastfeeding and natural spacing is often ignored even if systematic NFP is taught.  I remember one Protestant mother fighting her church to not provide daycare because it sends the wrong message.

For interested parents, articles at the NFPI website teach the importance of the mother during the early years of life.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding