Archive for the ‘Ecological Breastfeeding’ Category

1. Ecological Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Saturday, August 1st, 2015

Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding mothers experience widely different durations of breastfeeding amenorrhea. Some have a first menses by three months; others one or two years later. Research studies, both prospective and retrospective, were reviewed to determine if breastfeeding patterns affect the duration of breastfeeding amenorrhea. Studies from the 1940s up to the 21stth century show that only frequent suckling provides a significant delay of fertility. The type called ecological breastfeeding provides, on average, 14 to 15 months of breastfeeding amenorrhea.

Conclusion: Breastfeeding types need to be defined. The Church should promote and teach ecological breastfeeding as a desirable option for natural family planning. Eco-breastfeeding involves no abstinence, offers many benefits to mother and baby, is ecologically sound, and provides extended natural infertility. God does have a natural plan for spacing babies.

Let’s start with a simple question. Does God Himself have a plan for the natural spacing of babies through breastfeeding? In other words, has God Himself created woman in such a way that the suckling of her infant at her breasts will delay the return of her fertility to produce a natural spacing of births? The answer is YES, but only IF the breastfeeding involves frequent and unrestricted nursing. This natural spacing of babies is provided without sexual abstinence.

John and Sheila Kippley
(World NFP Congress, Milan, Italy, June 13, 2015. The following 7 blogs for World Breastfeeding Week are taken from our paper at this congress.)

From July 19th to the evening of August 7th (NFP Awareness Week through World Breastfeeding Week) anyone can purchase the following printed books at a 40% discount at lulu:
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach (coil edition preferred for learners)
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive
Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing
An additional 10% discount is offered by lulu through the end of August 3rd.  Code when ordering is INTERNET.  Thus anyone ordering a Kippley print book can receive a 50% discount through the end of August 3rd.

Natural Family Planning: Why NFP International Is Needed

Sunday, July 26th, 2015

By the fall of 2004 it was becoming clear to us that the NFP organization we founded in 1971 was making changes or dropping the three main teachings we brought to that organization that had served people so well for the 32 years of our leadership.

These three main teachings are called the Triple Strand.  We think the Triple Strand is so good that it needs to be kept alive and spread– we think that everybody in the world has the right to know these things.  Further, we think that our two specific charisms (the eco-breastfeeding and the covenant theology) are special gifts from God and have been confirmed by the actions and words of St. John Paul II.  In addition, Dr. Konald Prem’s teaching of the sympto-thermal method is superior to other NFP methods and should continue to be taught.  Thus this was the main reason, among others, as to why we started NFP International.

Regarding ecological breastfeeding
In 1995 St. John Paul II co-hosted with the Royal Society of England a conference on breastfeeding at the Vatican.  In his talk, he endorsed the recommendations of UNICEF and the WHO for mothers to breastfeed for two years and beyond.  Frequent suckling is the only way that a mother will have a milk supply at 12, 18, and 24 months.  And the Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding are a mother’s best assurance of frequent suckling. Some couples use only eco-bf to space their babies apart.  We know of two mothers who have written a series of blogs about the Seven Standards.  One’s website was called something like “Crunchy Lutheran Mom.”  The other wrote for her diocesan paper in Ireland.

Regarding the Covenant theology
In 1994, ten years after he completed his opus magnum of the Theology of the Body, the Pope wrote a short document titled “Letter to Families from John Paul II.”  In it he specifically endorsed the covenant theology.  “In the conjugal act, husband and wife are called to confirm in a responsible way the mutual gift of self which they have made to each other in the marriage covenant.”  This may be the first time a Pope has used such terminology.  Scott Hahn, a rather famous convert, told me that I am the first person (of whom he is aware) to put that concept into writing.  I can’t prove or disprove his opinion, but I take it seriously because he is the best-read person I know.  My book, Birth Control and the Marriage Covenant, was the occasion for him and his wife to learn this when they were married students in a Protestant seminary.  At the time, Scott considered himself the most anti-Catholic member of the student body.  I consider it divine Providence that another couple in their married student housing complex lent that book to his wife, Kimberly, whose father was the fairly well known pastor of a Presbyterian church in North College Hill.

Regarding the Prem STM
In 1976-1978 the US Bishops NFP organization persuaded NIH to conduct a study to compare the Billings mucus-only system with the cross-checking sympto-thermal system.  The results were so much in favor of the STM that the investigators stopped the study.  The difference was something like twice as many unplanned pregnancies in the mucus-only section.  It was a randomized study, and the investigators could no longer pretend that they didn’t know which half of the study was more effective in avoiding pregnancy.  Yet two of the principal mucus-only advocates put up such a fuss that these results are by and large ignored.  All too many mucus-only advocates have the diocesan NFP jobs.

Soooooo, in a nutshell, that’s why we feel obliged to do what we can to keep these ideas alive.

John and Sheila Kippley
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach
From July 19th to the evening of August 7th (NFP Awareness Week through World Breastfeeding Week) anyone can purchase the following printed books at a 40% discount at lulu:
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive
Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing

Breastfeeding: An easy treatment for sore nipples

Sunday, July 12th, 2015

Cochrane reported on a study for treating sore nipples for breastfeeding mothers (December 15, 2014). Cochrane is an independent non-profit, non-government organization in 130 countries with over 31,000 volunteers. In the field of human health, it does systematic reviews of primary research that is free from commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of interest.

What did the Cochrane report state regarding sore nipples?  First, many women quit breastfeeding during the first few weeks of breastfeeding; the most common reason given for quitting was sore nipples.  Four clinical trials were studied involving 656 women and 5 treatments (glycerine pads, lanolin with breast shells, lanolin alone, expressed breast milk, and an all-purpose nipple ointment) plus all women were educated on proper positioning of the infant at the breast.

Second, there was not one of these treatments that could be highly recommended; third,  usually within 7 to 10 days the situation improved regardless of the method used.

Warm Air from a Portable Hair Dryer
Sore nipples (in spite of following the La Leche instructions on treatment of the nipples before and after birth) were a problem for me.  After the birth of our fourth daughter in 1972, I had an especially difficult situation.  Nothing LLL recommended worked for me.  I even went without a bra, but even the shirt I wore bothered my nipples.

A good friend, Rose Busam, who at that time was a La Leche League leader and trained leaders-to-be, told me to apply warm air repeatedly using a portable hair dryer.  I used the dryer after each nursing and whenever I thought about using it.  If I remember correctly, I was fine within a full 24-hour period!  The quick relief was wonderful, and it was all due to the warm drying air.

Another case was helped by the hair dryer.  A nursing mother had a deep sore due to her baby’s bite near her nipple.  When it looked like it was healing, it would tend to open up again while breastfeeding her baby.  She was extremely concerned as to how she could get this wound to heal.  I recommended the portable hair dryer treatment and it worked.

If you are having a problem with sore nipples, please give this treatment a try.  It costs nothing as most of us have a hair dryer in our home.  One caution would be to have the warm air flow gently over the breastfeeding area.  Avoid a real strong force of air.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding