Archive for the ‘Ecological Breastfeeding’ Category

Natural Family Planning and Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, July 20th, 2014

Natural Family Planning: Ecological Breastfeeding Spaces Babies by John and Sheila Kippley (December 31, 1971)

NFP Awareness Week runs from July 20 through July 26, the 46th anniversary of  Humanae Vitae, the papal encyclical that reaffirned the Catholic Tradition against all unnatural forms of birth control.  I will post a blog each day during this commemorative week.  This series comes from an article we wrote in 1971, titled “Ecological Breastfeeding Spaces Babies.”  The excerpts have been edited only slightly but not at all in substance.

One good way to get an argument going is to ask, “Does breastfeeding space babies?”  If someone says yes, someone else is sure to say that she knows someone who got pregnant while nursing.  A third person might ask, “What type of nursing do you mean?” while some others might look on with amazement at the implication that 1) there is more than one type of nursing and 2) that the type of breastfeeding may influence the side effect of natural infertility.

Perhaps the key reason why debate arises about whether breastfeeding provides an effective period of natural infertility is that the infertility effect of breastfeeding is dependent upon an ecological pattern of child care.  Mothers who are willing to accept the conditions of the ecology of the nursing or mothering relationship will experience an extended period of natural infertility in the vast majority of cases.  Those who do not follow the ecological requirements cannot reasonably  hope for the natural side effects.

John and Sheila Kippley

Natural Family Planning: The New Evangelization

Sunday, June 15th, 2014

Many diocese are placing special emphasis on the New Evangelization.

I think that the program of NFP International is unique with its emphasis on the New Evangelization, ecological breastfeeding as a form of NFP, and a choice-oriented approach to systematic NFP.  

The New Evangelization.  We hear much about this but little that is concrete.  Early on it was defined as the effort to show that Jesus is the Author of the specific teachings of the Church, and that is what guided us in writing our NFP manual, Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach.  In chapter 1, we connect the dots between Jesus and Humanae Vitae via the Last Supper and Nicea.  If you do not have a copy, you can obtain a printed copy and/or download it from the NFPI website.

The covenant theology was originally intended to be an agent of evangelization among our fellow Catholics, but it has also proved to be helpful for others.   Scott Hahn credits it with helping to persuade him and his wife to accept Catholic teaching on birth control when they were still Protestants.  This is also integrated into Chapter 1.

Ecological breastfeeding.  Every year there seems to be some new research revealing another benefit of breastfeeding, and most of these benefits are dose-related and duration-related.  Every style of breastfeeding conveys some benefits, but only ecological breastfeeding according to the seven standards has sufficient baby-spacing that it deserves to be taught as a form of natural family planning.  Chapter 6 of our manual is devoted to this subject.  Extensive research is found at the NFPI website.

This should not be a matter of controversy, but some are very resistant to teaching this.  As my wife and I see it, this is part of God’s plan for mother and baby.  It is part of his order of creation.  We didn’t invent the ecology.  All we have done is to describe it.  My wife’s research built upon previous research; her unique contribution was the seven-standards hypothesis.  She demonstrated it, and others have done the same.  Eco-breastfeeding according to the seven standards IS a form of natural baby spacing.

The big question for dioceses is this:  Does the diocese help to inform young people about this ecology or does it ignore it?  We believe ecological breastfeeding is simply a God-arranged plan that maximizes all the benefits of breastfeeding AND normally delays the return of menstruation and fertility for an average of 14 to 15 months among American mothers.  (In some cultures the duration of breastfeeding infertility is much longer.)  It is the latter reason that provides a compelling reason for teaching this as part of NFP instruction–especially when the instruction is required by the archdiocese or diocese.  We believe that everyone has a God-given right to know this information so that they can make an informed choice.  That means that Catholic educators, especially those preparing couples for marriage, should be teaching this information.

John F. Kippley

NFP: Is Eco-Breastfeeding a Form of Contraception?

Sunday, June 1st, 2014

To breastfeed your baby according to the Seven Standards of ecological breastfeeding is not and cannot be a form of contraception. First, you cannot force your baby to nurse. Second, even if you do this form of frequent nursing with the hopes of having a delay in the return of your fertility, the activity is not one of contraception. It is God Himself who made woman in such a way that frequent nursing usually suppresses the return of fertility as a side effect. To consciously hope for the side effect is simply not a contraceptive behavior. Nor is it wrong to hope for any and all of the other effects of breastfeeding such as the health benefits for both mother and baby. Nor is it wrong to nurse your baby because s/he is fussy and your primary motivation for nursing right at that moment is simply to pacify the baby. There is absolutely nothing wrong with hoping for these side effects, and efforts to dump guilt upon those who do so are misguided.

John F. Kippley