Archive for the ‘Ecological Breastfeeding’ Category

Ecological Breastfeeding: Six Definitions Not Found in the Dictionary. Part 1

Sunday, November 10th, 2013

1) Breastfeeding is a pro-life activity.  
Breastfeeding provides many benefits—both emotional and physical—to mother and baby.  These benefits provide a fuller, healthier life for the baby as well as for the mother…now and later.  By later, I mean that years after the breastfeeding has ended breastfeeding is still providing benefits and thus is a true “gift of life.”  As Pope John Paul II said so well—breastfeeding “benefits the child and helps to create the closeness and maternal bonding so necessary for healthy child development” (“Breastfeeding: Science and Society,” May 12, 1995).

2) Breastfeeding is essential for life.
It is God’s plan for the child’s survival after birth.  There are only two acts that are essential for the continuation of the human race: the marriage act between husband and wife and the breastfeeding between mother and child.  God made both acts pleasurable and good to ensure the race would continue.  Unfortunately in our society, we can produce babies without mom and dad, and we can feed babies without the mother.  Thus, we tend to forget how important both acts are in maintaining life.

3) Breastfeeding is God’s plan for mother and baby.
Are we obliged to follow God’s plan for us?  Is breastfeeding a biological law that should be followed?  Certain encyclicals and writings by the Pope stress the importance of following or adhering to the biological law of our very nature.  For example, when reading Humanae Vitae, we are told in Section 11 that “God has wisely arranged the natural laws and times of fertility so that successive births are naturally spaced….and that the teachings based on natural law must be obeyed.”   One can argue that breastfeeding is the most natural form of baby spacing. By directly respecting the divinely ordained ecology, mother and baby indirectly postpone the return of maternal fertility.  On the other hand, periodic abstinence takes conscious effort.

Getting back to the encyclicals again, in Humanae Vitae, Section 31, we are told to “observe the laws inscribed on [our] nature by the Most High God” and that we must cultivate these laws if we are to be happy.

In The Gospel of Life, Pope John Paul II expresses similar thoughts.  In Section 22, he writes:  “There is a plan of God for life which must be respected.”  In Section 42, he tells us we are subject to the biological laws.  In Section 97, we are told to “respect the biological laws inscribed in [our] person.”

God’s plan for us with respect to breastfeeding should be given serious consideration and be followed unless there is a sufficiently serious reason not to breastfeed.

To be continued next week.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding

Ecological Breastfeeding: One person can make a difference!

Sunday, November 3rd, 2013

In going over some old files, I came across a memory.  Speaking to a Cincinnati group dedicated to natural childbirth and breastfeeding, I related a fondness I had for a childbirth instructor who was the first influence in how I would give birth and mother my baby.

I began my talk back in 1978 with this:    “Today’s gathering brings back special memories for me because I am especially fond of my first childbirth instructor I had some 14 years ago.  I didn’t realize it at the time, but much later I came to realize how much of an influence she had made upon my life.  At that time the classes [in the Santa Clara/San Jose area] were part of the adult education program and held at the local high school.  She was both a mother and a public health nurse.  Because of her, I had a wonderful childbirth experience and also considered breastfeeding for the very first time.  She would announce the dates of the La Leche League meetings when they were in the area and invited a nursing mother to class.  I saw a mother nurse for the first time as she answered questions from the class.  So I felt I was very fortunate to be in her class.”

I’m sure there are other “teachers” in our lives whom we wish we could have thanked at the time we had them.  Usually it isn’t until later that we realize how fortunate we were to have been in contact with them.  I am especially grateful also for my obstetrician who told me to just exclusively breastfeed and call him when I had my first period.  When I had my first period at 12 months postpartum, we were moving to Canada.  I am thankful for the pediatrician who was so supportive of my breastfeeding in order to space our next baby.  He never told me when to start solids even when I asked him.  Our baby was very healthy.  She had her first tooth at 8 months and started to accept solids at that time.  I regret I never took the time to thank the birth instructor, the obstetrician, and the pediatrician.

I am grateful for many others, including friends and relatives, and hope you as a reader of these blogs also have many persons in your life to be thankful for as well.

Sheila Kippley

Natural Family Planning Greatly Reduces Breast Cancer

Sunday, October 20th, 2013

October is the month in which emphasis is placed on finding a cure for breast cancer, but not much is said about preventing it.  Natural Family Planning is a great way to reduce a woman’s chance of getting breast cancer.

To those who are informed, the most obvious way to reduce the risk of breast cancer is simple: Never take the Pill.  If a young woman takes the Pill for 4 years or more before her first full-term pregnancy, she increases her risk of breast cancer by 44%.   The World Health Organization has stated that the Pill is in a Group 1 (worst kind) carcinogen.  Every October Pink article ought to be warning against the Pill!

Breastfeeding, God’s own plan for spacing babies—especially via ecological breastfeeding, greatly reduces a mother’s risk for getting breast cancer.  The American Institute for Cancer Research states that breastfeeding, especially exclusive followed by extended breastfeeding, reduces the risk of maternal breast cancer. It also decreases the risk of the child getting cancer.  Why?  Because breastfeeding helps to keep children from becoming overweight during their early years.  If a child is overweight, he or she tends to be overweight as an adult.  “Adults with excess body fat are at increased risk of at least 6 different types of cancer, namely cancers of the pancreas, colorectum, breast (postmenopausal), endometrium, kidney and esophagus,” according to the American Institute for Cancer Research, “What You Should Know About Breastfeeding.”

Researchers of a 2002 study involving 147,000 women said that a major contributor to the high incidence of breast cancer in the USA is that mothers do not breastfeed or breastfeed for too short a time.  “If women in developed countries had 2.5 children, on average, but breastfed each child for six months longer than they currently do, about 25,000 breast cancers would be prevented each year, and if each child were breastfed for an additional twelve months, about 50,000 breast cancers might be prevented annually.”

What needs to be said by those involved with promoting breast cancer prevention is that taking the Pill and formula-feeding are high risk factors for breast cancer. Even when breast cancer has occurred in a family relative, the woman who breastfeeds reduces her chance of getting premenopausal breast cancer by 59%! One in 8 women will develop breast cancer and almost 40,000 die from this disease every year.

With ecological breastfeeding, the presence of amenorrhea is a factor for the decreased risk of ovarian cancer as well as breast cancer.

Natural Family Planning, whether it be systematic NFP to avoid the Pill or ecological breastfeeding, needs to be widely promoted for all its health benefits, especially during the breast-cancer prevention month of October.

For more information on breast cancer prevention, read “Breast Cancer: Risks and Prevention” by Breast Cancer Prevention Institute.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor