Archive for 2009

A good natural family planning course

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

What should couples learn in a balanced or good NFP program?
      By “good” we mean complete.  What couples should learn is far more than just an inexpensive and effective method of spacing babies.  What they will learn in a well-rounded NFP program will include the following:
     •How the fertility-menstrual cycle functions
     •The common signs of fertility and infertility
     •The importance of well-balanced nutrition for healthy fertility
     •Natural ways to enhance fertility 
     •The practical, health-related  reasons for making the NFP-only decision
     •The moral and religious reasons for the NFP-only decision
     •The most accurate way to estimate the “due date”
     •Exclusive breastfeeding
     •The Seven Standards of Ecological breastfeeding
     •The return of fertility after childbirth
     •How to manage special situations

Sheila Kippley
Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach, 2009
Breastfeeding and Catholic Motherhood, 2005
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor, 2008
Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing, 1974 classic edition, 2008

Sterilization

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

    Someone asked me, “What IS compelling justification for sterilization?”  There is none.  What leads people to try to justify sterilization is fear.  Fear of another pregnancy and fear of the periodic abstinence involved in systematic natural family planning.  Just as perfect love casts out fear (1 John 4:18), so also perfect fear can cast out love, that is, what is supposed to be the self-giving love of the marriage act.
     In addition, each and every time the deliberately sterilized couple engage in the marriage act, they are engaging in an act of deliberately sterilized intercourse, defrauding the act of its built-in meaning as a renewal of their marriage covenant, for better AND for worse.  The contraceptive act of married spouses says, “We take each other for better but definitely and positively NOT for the imagined worse of possible pregnancy.”  That contradicts the built-in meaning of the marriage act and renders it dishonest.
     If a couple has been sterilized and are now repentant, they ought to have reversal surgery.  Then if they think they have sufficiently serious reasons to avoid pregnancy, they ought to monitor her fertility and abstain during the fertile time.  If health or finances or some other truly serious reason makes reversal surgery an extraordinary difficulty, they may not be obliged to have it, but they still ought to abstain during the fertile time as in the previous sentence. 
    This is not a harsh judgment.  It is simply realistic.  Most people would agree that repentance means having the attitude that “if I had it to do over again, I would not do it.”  With regard to sexual sterilization, that means they wouldn’t have undergone sterilization and would still be fertile.  If they had sufficiently serious reasons to avoid pregnancy, they would be monitoring her fertility and abstaining during the fertile time.  So my opinion above is simply saying that the repentant sterilized couple should be doing just what other couples are doing when they want to practice the morally right way of avoiding pregnancy.
    If you have not read it yet, I think you will like my work, Sex and the Marriage Covenant.  For example in Chapter 17, you will find my analysis of biblical texts that show that the Lord has condemned every form of sexual intercourse except the non-contraceptive act of spouses married to each other. Chapter 12, “The Sterilized Couple” is now available at our website under the title, “The Repentant Sterilized Couple.”
     Sex and the Marriage Covenant is a book that makes a good gift to a seminarian or a priest.
 
In the his service,
John F Kippley
NFP International
www.nfpandmore.org
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)

What is natural family planning?

Sunday, June 28th, 2009

Sheila:  A friend was under many deadlines and asked John if he could provide a text summarizing natural family planning and Church teaching in 250 words or less.  Our friend needed this the next day. The following is what John wrote:

A brief description of Natural Family Planning in 234 words:

Natural Family Planning (or NFP) is a general term that refers to the use of natural methods to achieve and to avoid pregnancy.  There are two basic forms of NFP—Systematic NFP and Ecological Breastfeeding. 

Systematic NFP consists of “fertility awareness” so that the spouses know the fertile and infertile times of the wife’s fertility-menstrual cycle.  Fertility awareness is an educated awareness of the normal female signs of fertility and infertility.  There are several common signs of fertility, and when couples take an NFP course, they learn how to observe and interpret these signs.  When seeking pregnancy, they engage in the marriage act during the fertile time.  When seeking to avoid pregnancy, the couple practice chaste abstinence during the fertile time.   
 
The second basic form of NFP is Ecological Breastfeeding.  This is a form of the form of nursing in which 1) the mother fulfills her baby’s needs for frequent suckling and her full-time presence and 2) in which the child’s frequent suckling postpones the return of the mother’s fertility.  Studies have shown that mothers who do this form of breastfeeding experience, on the average, 14 to 15 months before their first postpartum period.

Since the apostolic era, the Catholic Church has taught that it is immoral to use contraception.  Today, the Church encourages couples to learn NFP, to be generous in having children, and to raise them in the ways of the Lord.

by John Kippley