Archive for 2015

Natural Family Planning: Our bodies are for the Lord.

Sunday, April 19th, 2015

Dear Friends in Christ,

There is nothing more basic in Catholic teaching about how we are to live than the teaching on sexual conduct, or sexuality, as it’s called today.  This moral teaching, so definite, clear, and strict as you know, can be summed up in that principle St. Paul puts before us in our second reading today:  “The body is not for immorality but for the Lord.”  That is why the Church holds us to such strict conduct when it comes to sexuality.  It is because the body is to be used as our Creator intended and in no other way, which is what “for the Lord” means.

What did our Creator intend?  He created Adam and said it was not good for him to be alone, so He created the woman Eve and joined them in marriage for the purpose of a life-long union of love and that not just for its own sake but for the procreation of children.  Is not the meaning of sex clear, then, the meaning God placed in sexuality?  Sex is for love, sexual love is for marriage, and marriage is for children, for family.  This is also what our reason tells us about the purpose of sexuality, that it is for marriage and children, and that is our traditional Christian understanding of it.  It is what we want our children to know, and we pray that this age that makes such tragic mistakes about sex might see it, too, this natural law written into reason and conscience by the Creator, that sex is for love, sexual love is for marriage, marriage is for the love that brings forth children and cherishes them in a stable home where there is a mother and a father.

We want marriage to be what God intends it to be, “a union of one man and one woman in a lifelong, exclusive relationship of loving trust, compassion and generosity open to the conception of children.”  Note that last phrase, “open to the conception of children,” which means that contraception is not using the body “for the Lord” because it is contrary to the purpose of marriage which is to be “open to the procreation of children.”

So, then, the body with its sexuality is “for the Lord” in having this meaning that the Lord intends—-for the love in marriage, for children and family.  The negative form of this principle, that the body “is not for immorality,”  we have this in the sixth and ninth commandments which both the Jewish tradition and the Church have always interpreted as meaning that sex outside of married love is against the express will of our Maker.  As mere self-gratification, as in casual coupling or homosexuality, whatever form it takes outside of marriage, it is the immorality St. Paul speaks of here, a sin, he says, against our own body which is the temple of the Holy Spirit and not to be misused and profaned in this way.  “Immorality” is the real and honest term for being “sexually active,” as that term is used today.  Mortal sin is also the term for this most serious disregard for the will of our God that goes against our true nature.

Let us listen further to the Apostle Paul, to what he adds onto his principle about the body being for the Lord.  He adds a fundamental fact that covers the whole of our life:  “You are not your own,” he says.  Of course, we’re not because we did not make ourselves, so the one who did has every claim on us and every right to have us—-for our own good—-live as He made us to live.  And it isn’t just that He made us either.  “We have been purchased, St. Paul says, “at a price.”  What a price! we can add, knowing the price was our Lord’s suffering on the cross that restored us to God and the true meaning of things like sex after we had fallen away.

Now this, as we’ve said, applies to everything about us and how we live, this understanding that God owns us. That the Lord owns our sexuality is what St. Paul is emphasizing here.  We acknowledge this in the face of a world that disregards this truth with the awful consequences of disregarding it: abortion, unwed mothers and so many children without fathers, the absurdity of “same sex marriage.” the scourge and plague of pornography—-and all that’s tearing at the family today. .  It is a loving ownership that lets us be free to acknowledge it and then to make it into the ownership of our hearts, which means that we love and obey our Father who made us and made us to be happy with Him forever.   When the God-given purpose of sex is ignored, that purpose is tragically lost: love, marriage, and family.  When it is acknowledged and lived, then we preserve these precious things and, as St. Paul says, “we glorify God in our bodies.”

We acknowledge the truth about sexuality in the face of our own weak flesh.  So along with our acceptance that God does have the say entirely over our sexuality, must go a constant plea for the grace to live by what He says.  I don’t know anyone who put it better in a brief prayer than St. Augustine who certainly had his problems with sexuality before his conversion.  He just said, “Lord, you have commanded chastity.  Grant what you command, and command what you will.”  He didn’t argue or reason about it.  Reason is pretty weak when we are strongly tempted.  It is love of Our Lord that is our strongest motive and our reliance on Him that is our strength.  Which is why Augustine adds those words, saying:  “Ask whatever you want, command what you will, and I will do it; with your help I will do it.”

All we have to understand is that God wills something and the rest is up to our love.  Like so many sacrifices involved in Christian living, this one of self-control about sex is first and last a test of our love, a very real and constant test of our love for Jesus because He commands it so clearly and because it can be so difficult.  “Lord, you have commanded chastity.  Grant what you command, and command what you will.”  That is a great act of love.

This is a hopeful prayer, to be sure.  It’s like the Gospel today when the disciples ask Jesus where he is staying and He says “Come, and you will see.” Yes, come to Him and we will see what we need to see about all that concerns our happiness, like chastity in our lives and in our homes.  See it and see our way to it through the grace of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Fr. James Reidy
St. Paul MN
Second Sunday of the Year, 2015, B

The Needs of Natural Family Planning International

Sunday, April 12th, 2015

The primary mission of NFP International is to promote and teach Natural Family Planning. This includes ecological breastfeeding, systematic NFP, marital chastity, and the call to generosity in having children and raising them in the ways of the Lord.

NFPI is unique in its teaching of Ecological Breastfeeding and the renewal-of-the-marriage covenant theology that is so easy to grasp.  NFPI is also unique as an effort of the New Evangelization, specifically addressing the question “Why should I believe what the Catholic Church teaches about birth control?”  NFPI may also be unique in transmitting Catholic moral teaching regarding love, marriage, and sexuality.  The importance of this is made clear when people tell us that they have engaged for years in immoral practices in the fertile time, saying they were never told about chaste abstinence in their natural family planning course.

So I beg for your help.  The biggest issue in the Church today and for the past 50 years has been sexual morality.  The widespread acceptance of unnatural forms of birth control has led to the acceptance of sodomy—both heterosexual and homosexual—and now to same-sex marriage.  Neither the Church nor the country can truly prosper without a renewal of marital chastity.

The Humanae Vitae apostolate is the most difficult in the Church.  It is the only one that is actively opposed by many in the Church.  It is also actively ignored, if I can use that phrase, even by some who hold leadership positions within the Church.  That’s why I and my fellow teachers so greatly appreciate your support.

We ask your prayers and sacrifices and financial support for the NFPI apostolate.   Please donate to NFP International so that we can continue serving the Church in this ministry.

Stephen Craig
Executive Director

NFPI

4. Breastfeeding Research, October-December 2014

Sunday, March 29th, 2015

Breastfeeding reduces the risk of intestinal disorders for babies.  Infants, especially those born prematurely, are at increased risk for a potentially lethal gastrointestinal disease called necrotizing enterocolitis, also known as NEC. The researchers found that a protein called neuregulin-4 (NRG4) can help reduce this risk. However, this protein can be found only in breast milk and not in formula milk. According to statistics, more than 13 percent of babies with NEC die from the disease, and even survivors can face lifelong consequences that may include removal of part of their intestine and dependence upon intravenous nutrition. (The American Journal of Pathology, October 2014, pp. 2768-2778)

Breastfeeding beyond two months helps babies reduce the risk of obesity.  Those children at higher risk for rising weight gain should breastfeed for a longer duration.  Researcher Stacy Carling said: “Breastfeeding, especially on demand (versus on a schedule), allows an infant to feed when he/she is hungry, thereby fostering an early development of appetite control. When a baby breastfeeds, she can control how much milk she gets and how often, naturally responding to internal signals of hunger and satiation. (“Breastfeeding Duration and Weight Gain Trajectory in Infancy,” Pediatrics, December 2014)

Nine policies have been passed in Pakistan from 2007 to 2012 to favor breastfeeding but these programs have had no impact.  Only about one-third of the babies are breastfed exclusively for the first six months, the worst rate among South Asian countries.  On average, 25 to 30 mothers take their babies to the public hospitals daily due to acute diarrhea.  As the researcher said, “Mothers should exclusively breastfeed their babies at least during the first six months and avoid formula milk which is the root cause of many diseases including diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections among children.”  Mothers need to learn the importance of breastfeeding.  In Pakistan there is a high infant mortality rate owing to low breastfeeding and high bottle feeding rate. “According to experts, human milk is important for nourishment, survival and growth of infants. Breastfeeding in the first six months of life stimulates babies’ immune systems and protects them from diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections, the two major causes of infant mortality, and improves their responses to vaccination. Only one-third of all infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.”  (“Breastfeeding: As bottle feeding trend rises, so does infant mortality,” The Express Tribune and International New York Times, December 1, 2014)
Sheila:  Everyone doing ministry work in other countries should be strong promoters for breastfeeding if they want to save lives.

Breastfeeding problems were linked to an injection after birth.  The study included 288 mothers who were given an injection, ergotmetrine, to speed up the delivery of the placenta.  Those mothers who were given the injections were prone to more breastfeeding problems and were less likely to be breastfeeding past two weeks. (Breastfeeding Medicine, December 2014, Vol. 9, No. 10, 494-502)

An analysis of more than 36,000 women in 4 continents found that breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer by up to 20%.  Breastfeeding mothers are “about 12% less likely to develop breast cancer” and “the protective benefit could be even higher.” (San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 11, 2014)

A study found that 50% of babies who have tongue-tie will not experience any problem.  “Frenulotomy in the newborn is a low-rish procedure performed without anaesthetic” and should be done only by those trained to do so.  The procedure should only be done for the comfort and continuation of breastfeeding.  (“Tongue-tie and frenolotomy in infants with breastfeeding difficulties: achieving a balance,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306211)

Exclusive breastfeeding was compared with other forms of infant feeding in children from single births (502,948 singletons) during the years 1997 to 2013 in Scotland.  Those infants who were formula-fed or mixed-fed had more hospitalizations for common childhood illnesses compared with infants exclusively breastfed for 6-8 weeks of age. These childhood illnesses included gastrointestinal, respiratory and urinary tract infections, otitis media, fever, asthma, diabetes, and dental caries. The researchers said in an interview:  “Our findings were consistent with other studies and showed a greater risk of hospital admission amongst infants who were not breastfed particularly within six months of birth… At least one in five hospitalizations for gastrointestinal and lower respiratory tract infections within six months of birth may have been averted (all other factors remaining constant) had all children in the cohort been exclusively breastfed 6 to 8 weeks after birth. The association was also evident beyond six months of birth.” (“Breastfeeding is Associated with Reduced Childhood Hospitalization,” The Journal of Pediatrics, online Dec. 30, 2014)

For 1 million babies every year, their day of birth is also their day of death, accounting for more than a third of neonatal deaths. Evidence shows that when mothers initiate breastfeeding within one hour of birth, the baby’s risk of neonatal death is reduced by 44 per cent.   Globally, fewer than half of newborns are put to the breast immediately after birth, and even lower proportions are exclusively breastfed during their first six months of life.  Close to 2 million newborns die in the first week of life.  Children born shortly after another sibling are also at greater risk of dying than those born after longer intervals between births….Another important determinant of newborn survival is birth spacing. Children born less than two years after their closest older sibling are nearly twice as likely to die during the first month of life as those born two or three years later.  (“Child Survival” UNICEF, NY, September 2014)
Sheila:  We would save a lot of babies by promoting and teaching ecological breastfeeding.  Mothers would breastfeed immediately, do exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life, and would experience the natural spacing of two to three years between babies which God provides for both mother and baby.  It is part of God’s plan, but is often ignored by the medical profession and those involved in church ministry.

John Kippley’s blog addresses the issue of Catholic school contracts.

Sheila Kippley
Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Breastfeeding and Catholic Motherhood
www.NFPandmore.org