Archive for 2019

Natural Family Planning: Opposition to Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, November 10th, 2019

The organization we founded n 1971 developed a new NFP program a few years after our separation and dropped the three basic teachings that we brought to this organization.  One reason given for not teaching ecological breastfeeding was that many of the medical professionals had not heard of eco-breastfeeding.  That, of course, could be said about the symptom thermal method.

Another reason given was that mothers felt guilty if their periods returned early.  I did a survey in that organization among those mothers who said that eco-breastfeeding did not work for them.  None were following all of the Seven Standards.  Secondly, we taught eco-breastfeeding since 1971 and no one complained if their menses returned early post-partum.  We also stated that you grow in parenting and showed how we changed in our form of baby-care between baby #1 and baby #2.

A few say that we teach eco-breastfeeding just for spacing, and that we are teaching couples how not to have babies. That’s a serious misunderstanding.  We state over and over the many benefits for mother and baby.  Natural birth spacing is just one of those benefits.  Right now my husband is on the bandwagon promoting breastfeeding for the environment because the British Medical Journal recently (Oct. 2) published an article against formula and its bad effect upon the environment.  Alternatively, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months was strongly endorsed.

Most importantly, we teach couples through Scripture and papal talks that they are called to be generous in having children.  Compared to other NFP organizations, I believe we are an exception in strongly teaching generosity.  As one person said about the NFP organizations:  “The “emphasis should not be on how we can morally restrict the size of our family, but on how we can open our hearts and allow our families to grow.”

Some mothers have specific health reasons for breastfeeding according to the Seven Standards.  One reason would be breast cancer among female family members.  Another mother told us she had several women in her family who developed ovarian cancer.  She followed the Seven Standards in the hopes of avoiding ovarian cancer.  Is she to be criticized because she had one main reason for breastfeeding in a natural manner as part of God’s plan for her?

The most important benefit of following God’s plan for mother and baby through breastfeeding is the wonderful mother/baby relationship that develops and is so important during those early years.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding

Natural Family Planning: Church experiences with breastfeeding

Sunday, November 3rd, 2019

A positive and two negative experiences with local parish Churches.

“Our story began in 1980 with a NFP class at St. Ann’s Catholic Church in Houston Texas.  It was strengthen by a pediatrician that prayed over our little baby and assured me that if we went to the Folk Mass at St. Ann’s no one would try and take my little baby girl to the nursery and I could even nurse her comfortably at the back of the church (the church gym) where all the moms hung out with their infants and toddlers.  We weren’t even Catholic, but my body knew that I needed my baby and she needed me so I could discover the kind of mother I wanted to become.
And, fast forward, on June 1, 2019, our son and 5th child of 6, became a Roman Catholic Priest!  Thank you for helping us stay on the path towards holiness.  We want to be saints.”

___________________

From a deacon in formation who once taught eco-breastfeeding in the NFP classes with his wife.  When their NFP organization dropped the teaching of ecological breastfeeding, they stopped teaching NFP.   Here are his comments on promoting eco-breastfeeding in his Catholic community.

“I am trying to bolster my arguments that there is a positive moral obligation to breastfeed.  When I have brought up ecological breastfeeding (EB) and the moral obligation to breastfeed in the moral theology courses and the seminar on NFP, my comments were met with not only incredulity but sometimes down-right derision.
“Concerning the resistance to that we have encountered, I will give you a couple of anecdotes.  We have six children, all of whom have been raised with EB. The youngest three were born after we moved.  The other deacon candidate (I’ll call him “X”) from my parish is a providentialist, and X and his wife are adamantly against breastfeeding because in their words ‘couples are supposed to have as many children as possible to populate the Earth and give glory to God.’  They have had 7 children in 8 years and practice what I call “detachment” parenting—little mother-child bonding whatsoever and refusing to give in to the “whims” of their babies by soothing them when they cry.  Since we are both deacon candidates, we are both on the parish council.  At one of our meetings, X stated that he was disturbed that so many of the new mothers in our parish were using the cry room to breastfeed.  He felt uncomfortable being in the room with his children because he did not want to “expose” them to breastfeeding.  He also mentioned how public breastfeeding is inherently immodest, and that mothers should especially not breastfeed in Church.  He demanded that our pastor either put a stop to the breastfeeding in the cry room, or provide him with another space to be with his children when they acted up.  He suggested that my pastor wire the church hall (in the basement) with a live video feed.  My pastor (who is nationally known from EWTN) actually was open to the request and in fact made several disparaging remarks about women breastfeeding in public, including how immodest lit was, etc.  The only thing that stopped the conversation from going any further was a question that I posed to my pastor:  Did he realize that my wife had breastfed 3 children in the front pew of the Church, in front of the ambo, for the last six years?  Well, you can imagine the embarrassed expression that came over his face.  To make a long story short, the idea was dropped.
“Another anecdote involves the diaconate formation program itself.  We have been discouraged from bringing any children with us to the gatherings that the wives are required to attend.  Well, this was problematic, since our second youngest daughter was just over one year old when I was accepted for formation.  We more or less ignored the advice and brought her with us anyway, including to my entrance interview, with no problems.  However we were required to attend a retreat and were told in no uncertain terms that our little one was not allowed to come.  If we brought her, we would be told to leave.  We made the anguished decision to leave her with a babysitter for the weekend.  What a disaster!  While we had tried for 2 months to prepare her for the time apart, including trying to wean her, she was not ready to be ap-art for that long.  This led to an  angry confrontation with my director of formation.  While the program has backed down, last September my wife and 4-month old were not allowed to attend the annual retreat.  I was told by the director that some of the candidates and their wives had told him that they felt it would be too distracting to have a breastfeeding baby there.  At least my wife wasn’t required to attend, but she could have easily done so with minimal distraction.  However, I have resigned myself to the fact that the program feels that ecological breastfeeding is just too “countercultural,” even though we have proven time and again that our babies are well-behaved and quiet in public if they are with mom.
My wife wanted me in particular to make sure to thank you for all the work that you have done.  Our children have told us that they lovingly remember their nursing years.  You have truly been an inspiration to us, and your work has made a tremendously powerful and positive impact on our marriage and family life.  We are constantly sharing your books with the young couples and families in our parish, and we are both glad that you have decided to continue your work with NFPI.”

Sheila Kippley
(PS:  Some of our readers might want to respond to our blogs.  You may do so by going to our website at contact us.  We had hacking issues and thus discontinued blog comments.)

 

 

Natural Family Planning: What Pope, Cardinal and Bishop are saying about Ecological Breastfeeding

Sunday, October 27th, 2019

St. John Paul II:  “Greater consideration should be given to the social role of mothers, and support should be given to programs which aim at decreasing maternal mortality, providing prenatal and perinatal care, meeting the nutritional needs of pregnant women and nursing mothers, and helping mothers themselves to provide preventive health care for their infants. In this regard attention should be given to the positive benefits of breastfeeding for nourishment and disease prevention in infants as well as for maternal bonding and birth spacing.” [Address to Dr. Nafis Sadik, Secretary General of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, March 18, 1994, n. 8. Emphasis added.]

Alfonso Cardinal López Trujillo, then President of the Pontifical Council for the Family:
“For many years the value of breastfeeding has been recognized especially in terms of the close bond it establishes between a mother and her child and the health benefits of a natural form of nourishing infants. It is therefore heartening to see a revived interest in this natural form of nurturing. However, there is another dimension of breastfeeding that is not as widely known, that is, choosing breastfeeding as a natural means for spacing births.
Used in this way, breastfeeding has been found to be of particular value, not only in various traditional cultures, where such an approach has been known for centuries, but in the wider world. As one of the natural ways for regulating fertility, breastfeeding thus takes its place among various methods that constitute the ‘authentic alternative’ to contraception, and so it remains a subject for research and study.” (Foreword, Breastfeeding and Natural Child Spacing: The Ecology of Natural Mothering, Classic Edition, 2008. Emphasis added.)

Most Rev. Victor Galeone, former Bishop of St. Augustine, Florida: “You mentioned that Macabbees is the only place in the Bible that mentions the length of three years for breastfeeding in Biblical Times.  Back in the mid 60s when the Pill was being discussed on the news, my mother (an immigrant from Italy who never went beyond the 3rd grade) commented to me: ‘A pity the mothers today don’t know what my mother taught me.  I breastfed all my children for two years.  And that’s why there’s at least three years between each of you.’  To which I replied, ‘Mom , we had teeth already by that time.’  To which she replied, ‘I know, but I could teach each one of you not to bite.’
My five years in the Peruvian Andes taught me basically the same thing.  Their children were spaced by three to four years, and they were ever so well behaved in Church as toddlers.  No crying or screaming.” ( personal correspondence, June 4, 2004, quoted with permission)

More coming on experiences with eco-breastfeeding in the Church.
Sheila Kippley