2. Breastfeeding Research, April-June 2014

March 15th, 2015

Breastfeed for more than three months and you may protect your baby from inflammation and heart disease as a young adult!  Chronic inflammation, caused by a hyperactive immune system, has been linked to heart disease and strokes, Type-2 diabetes, late-life disability, and a greater risk of dying.  Researchers noted that higher blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) are a key biomarker for inflammation and predict increased cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk in adulthood.  The levels of CPR were evaluated in almost 7,000 young adults aged from 24 to 32. Their analysis showed that:  1) Lower birth weights and shorter duration of breastfeeding predicted higher CRP levels in young adults, 2) For each extra pound of birth weight, the CRP level in young adulthood was 5% lower, and 3) CPR levels were 20-30% lower in young adults who were breastfed for 3-12 months as babies compared to those who were never breastfed. (“Long-term effects of birth weight and breastfeeding duration on inflammation in early adulthood,”   Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, online 23 April 2014)

Breastfeeding protects children from asthma according to researchers who studied the data from 117 scientific papers over 30 years and involving some 250,000 babies. Breastfeeding cuts the risk of asthma by 37 per cent in infants under three and by 17% for children aged seven and older. (“Breastfeeding and childhood asthma: systemic review and meta-analysis,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, May 15, 2014; 179 (10); 1153-67)

A fluoride study followed about 1000 persons up to the age of 38 from 1972-1973 in the town of Dunedin.  The study concluded that fluoridated water did not affect or lower one’s IQ.  However, the study found that breastfeeding was associated with a child’s high IQ. (“Community Water Fluoridation and Intelligence: Prospective Study in New Zealand” American Journal of Public Health, May 2014)

A medical researcher said exclusive breastfeeding of babies for six months could prevent them from developing cancer later in life.  Dr Bamidele Iwalokun of the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research said children denied exclusive breastfeeding in their first six months were prone to cancer.  Why?  Because Lactalbumin, found only in breast milk, is an anti-cancer agent and such a child is deprived of Lactalbumin.  Only about 17% of mothers breastfeed their babies exclusively.  The researcher said:  “Breast milk was the most complete form of nutrition for infants’ health, immunity and development. There is no better substitute than the breast milk for a child in the first six months of life. There is no infant formula that is better than breast milk because in the breast milk you have antibodies that will help defenceless infants to fight the war against diseases that challenge their lives.” (“Breastfeeding can prevent cancer,” Nigerian Tribrune, June 26, 2014)

No adverse effects on IQ could be seen from anti-epileptic drug exposure via breast milk at 6 years of age.  This study involved 181 children and found that “breastfed children exhibited higher IQ and enhanced verbal abilities,” according to the authors.  (JAMA Pediatrics, June 16, 2014)

Sheila Kippley
www.NFPandmore.org
PS:  I had to add this latest news.  This month at the Integrated Reproductive, Mother, Neonatal and Child Health Programme in Lahore, the capital city of Pakistani province of Punjab, it was reported that solid steps had been taken to reduce maternal mortality as well as child mortality up to age five years. Addressing the participants of the meeting, Health Director General Dr Zahid Pervaiz said that if mothers feed their babies for two years, the mortality rate in infants would be reduced as well as natural birth spacing and malnutrition problems would also be solved. He said that reasonable birth spacing could reduce the maternal mortality rate.  If anyone is interested in promoting natural child spacing through breastfeeding, please use the book The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding to send to others, those in the medical or missionary field.  It is a very short, inexpensive book and easy to read.

1. Breastfeeding Research, January-March 2014

March 8th, 2015

Introduction:  Last year I reviewed the breastfeeding research for 2013.  Following is a summary of some of the breastfeeding research of last year, 2014.  This research project was very time consuming; it appears more or less chronologically in this and the next three blogs.
____________
New research of over 7000 Chinese women found that those who breast-fed were about half as likely to develop rheumatoid arthritis compared to those who never breastfed. And the longer a woman breast-fed, the lower her risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. (Rheumatology, January 6, 2014)

While breastfeeding provides many benefits to mother and baby and two years of breastfeeding is recommended, there has been a steady decline of breastfeeding in Saudi Arabia.  The duration of breastfeeding went from 13.4 months in 1987 to 8.5 months in 2010.  Initiation rates were high (over 90%) but the breastfeeding rates during the first hour of life were very poor.  The most common reason given for cessation of breastfeeding was insufficient breast milk.  (International Breastfeeding Journal, January 2014, 9:1)
Sheila: If mothers were taught the Seven Standards, the duration of breastfeeding would be much longer because frequent suckling stimulates the milk supply.

Breastfeeding mothers (210 mothers or 53%) who supplemented with formula in the hospital were more likely to reduce their nursings or to stop breastfeeding during the first 60 days after birth as opposed to those mothers (183 mothers or 47%) who exclusively breastfed in the hospital.  “The relative risks of not fully breastfeeding and ceasing breastfeeding increased significantly with number of in-hospital formula feeds.”  (Journal of Pediatrics, February 2014)

Breastfeeding can help to prevent cancer in children.  We know from the research that bottle-feeding increases the risk of cancer in children, such as lymphoma and leukemia.  Now an Israeli research concludes that breastfeeding decreases the chances of developing cancer by 60% compared to those children not breastfed. Dr. Keinan-Boker, a professor at the University of Haifa and deputy director of the Health Ministry’s Center for Disease Control, found that children exclusively breastfed up until four months were 40% less likely to develop cancer compared to those children breastfed less than four months. (Israel Cancer Association, February 12, 2014)

Breast milk promotes good bacteria in the gut.  Breastfeeding stimulates the development of helpful lactic acid bacteria in a newborn’s gut flora, which are advantageous to the growth of the child’s immune system. (Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2014)

Studies show that breastfed children perform better at school and have higher IQs, but one study sought to find out why breastfed babies are smarter.  A new study by Brigham Young University sociologists studied 7500 mothers and children from birth to five years of age.  They found that breastfeeding was associated with two motherly behaviors: responding to the child’s emotional cues and reading to the child starting at 9 months of age.  Children in the study who were breastfed for 6 months or longer performed the best on reading assessments because they also “experienced the most optimal parenting practices.”  (Journal of Pediatrics, March 2014)

Sheila Kippley
www.NFPandmore.org

What Kind of Natural Family Planning is Needed by the Church

March 1st, 2015

Regarding the Synod and Humanae Vitae, I suspect that there will be a verbal affirmation of the encyclical.  My concern is more about prudence.

A committee of the US Bishops in 1989 urged that every engaged couple should be required to attend a full course on natural family planning as a normal part of preparation for marriage.  But what constitutes a full course?  That is a key question.

In my opinion, couples learning NFP under such circumstances deserve to learn all the common signs of fertility and infertility so that they can make a well informed choice about what signs they want to use or not use.  And that includes ecological breastfeeding according to the seven standards.  How can they make informed choices if this information is not taught?

They also deserve to learn the physiological aspects of NFP in the context of Catholic evangelization and morality and the call to be generous in having children to be raised in the ways of the Lord. In the last analysis, once an “avoiding” couple understand the health hazards and abortifacient properties of hormonal birth control and the esthetic and effectiveness problems of barriers, the moral and practical choice boils down to fertility awareness with either marital chastity or the use of masturbation and/or marital sodomy during the fertile time.  The unchaste behaviors are certainly NOT what is needed or intended by Catholic endorsements of NFP.

It is my understanding that most of the NFP instruction manuals and programs avoid saying anything specific about masturbation and marital sodomy.  We have to assume that many of  our “required” students are unfortunately already experienced in sinful sexual experiences. We have to assume that when they hear “abstinence” many will think of past experience as a way to get around it.  In my opinion, that’s why Catholic-sponsored NFP needs to be taught in the context of Christian discipleship.  

John F. Kippley
www.NFPandmore.org