Archive for the ‘Education’ Category

It’s the law in Indonesia to breastfeed!

Sunday, August 15th, 2010

Starting in October, the mothers in Indonesia are required by law to exclusively breastfeed their baby for six months.  Babies have this right and the mothers must fulfill this obligation.  Those mothers who refuse to breastfeed may go to jail for one year or pay a heavy fine.

Employers are required to help working mothers breastfeed.  If they do not support breastfeeding in the workplace, the employer will also be fined.

Promotion of formula, bottles and pacifiers to the general public will not be allowed.  Why is this country with the largest Muslim population doing this?  Breastfeeding reduces infant mortality rates and protects babies for years to come against various physical, neurological, and behavioral problems.

Another country is interested in passing legislation requiring mothers to breastfeed for two years.  The Muslim Rights Concern wants this law for Nigeria because children who have been breastfed for two years have been shown to be less prone to crime when they grow up.  (Medications & More, July 2009)

For those who think this concept is crazy, that breastfeeding reduces crime, please read an older blog, dated October 5, 2008. http://nfpandmore.org/wordpress/?m=2008&paged=5

In the U. S. only 14% of the babies were exclusively breastfed for six months in 2006.  Canadian mothers had the same rate in 2009, only 14% exclusively breastfed for six months.  Obviously, grade schools and high schools need to educate students on the importance of breastfeeding.  In the Cincinnati area one often sees a variety of billboards promoting breastfeeding, but one wonders if billboards alone can change a bottle-feeding culture.

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor
Breastfeeding and Catholic Motherhood

1. Lack of Breastfeeding in Haiti? 2. Menopause: Does anything go?

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

1.   ABC World News this evening (1/17/10) showed a Haitian woman who had just delivered a baby.  She and her friends complained that she had no milk for her baby.  She was amply endowed and was not holding the baby.  The big question is why in a poverty stricken area is not every mother breastfeeding.   Why have not the relief organizations and missionaries promoted breastfeeding?

2. When a woman is menopausal, some couples think that any kind of sexual activity is a moral option.  But menopause does not change the meaning of the marriage act. 
 
A woman asks us:
       I am no longer of child-bearing age,and I wanted to know if it was ok for me as a wife to perform oral sex on my husband?   I am past menopause and some times it still causes me pain to have intercourse even when I use jellies and creams for dryness.  I’m sorry for the embarressing question. 
   

John responded:
       I assume that by oral sex you meant your oral stimulation of your husband that brings him to ejaculation outside of your vagina.  That is still masturbation and is immoral.  While it no longer has the effect of contraception, it still destroys the symbolism of the marriage act, the mutual gift of self in the act of genital-genital union.  In marriage we are given the right to engage in that act that of its very nature is oriented toward the procreation of children.  So even if you are no longer capable of providing an egg, the marriage act is still oriented toward the procreation of children and the bonding of the spouses.  
       From a practical perspective, an ample amount of KY jelly can or should provide ample lubrication.  Make sure that it is sufficiently applied and into the full area where you experience dryness.
       If by “oral sex” you mean oral-genital stimulation to bring your husband to an erection sufficient for genital-genital intercourse, that is morally okay.  In fact, it can be an act of charity if he is otherwise impotent.
       If you can help this organization, we will appreciate it.  Just go to the “Please donate” tab in the “And more” box on the home page.  Both prayers and pennies are needed. 
 
John F Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)

The Risks of Breast Cancer

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Due to the recent guidelines about breast cancer detection, I was shocked when I read in our local newspaper that a woman medical director said that 80% of women with breast cancer have no known risk factors.

Does this mean that 80% of these women never took the birth control pill?  If they did, they gave themselves a known risk factor.   Dr. Chris Kahlenborn’s research was published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings (October 2006).   He clearly states that women who took the birth control Pill prior to the birth of their first child sustained a 44% average increased risk of developing pre-menopausal breast cancer (compared to women who never took the Pill) and that this risk increased to 52% for women who took the Pill for at least four years prior to the birth of their first child.

Did they not have children?   If they did have children, did they not breastfeed?   If they did not breastfeed, these women failed to take advantage of a known risk-reduction factor.

At our website we provide an excellent booklet, Breast Cancer: Risks and Prevention written by Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S. and Joel Brind, Ph.D.   Everyone should read this booklet.   You may download it.   It is only 22 pages.   Any young teenager or woman concerned about her health should read this booklet.   Any man who is interested in his wife’s health should never encourage her to take the pill and should do all he can to encourage her to breastfeed their children.   All parents should read it so they will not allow their daughter to take the Pill for acne or any other reason.

Sheila Kippley