Archive for the ‘Morality’ Category

A Bishop’s Mother’s Day Reflection

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

We blogged Bishop Galeone on April 25 for our series on spacing births via breastfeeding.  He shared this reflection with us and asked us not to publish it until after May 1, that is,  after it appeared in his diocesan newspaper column.  Now that our series on spacing births is over, we would like to share his article with our readers. 

Bishop Galeone:  As we approach another Mother’s Day, I want to invite you to come back with me to Mother’s Day 1970.

I had just sat down to have a light supper with my widowed mother before returning to the rectory. My mother was grieving because in less than a month she would be losing her “bambino.” You see, my archbishop had given me permission to serve as a missionary in Peru for five years, and I would be leaving within a month. 

The fact that I was 35 years old and a priest for ten years was trumped by my imminent departure for the Peruvian Andes, where I might meet with an untimely end—or so my mother imagined.

While having our soup, mother continued her complaining to the point that I blurted out an unkind remark.  She started to cry. 

“Mom, I’m sorry.  I don’t know what possessed me.  Please forgive me.”—“Oh, I’m not crying about that.”—“Well, why are you crying?”

She continued: “I’m going to tell you something that I’ve told no one except your father.  It was during the Depression years.  The social worker came by to see how things were going.  I told her that everything was fine except that I had missed two of my periods in a row.

“ ‘Oh that’s very bad news, Signora Rita!  I’ll come back on Thursday afternoon and take you to see this doctor, and he will make your period come.’

“I told her that I could never do that…that I would rather die first.

“ ‘What! You won’t cooperate!  Where’s your husband?’—He’s out looking for work.—‘Over two years without a steady job, and you won’t cooperate!  Three young mouths to feed already, and you won’t cooperate!  When your husband returns, talk this over with him. If you don’t cooperate, we just might take those two cards away from you. I’ll see you on Thursday!’ ”

Two comments: Being the fourth child in the lineup, I was that “period.” And the two cards referred to by the social worker were the one that entitled the family to receive a large bag of dried beans every two weeks, and the other was for an occasional delivery of coal during the winter. 

My mother continued: “Two hours later, your father came home all frostbitten. As I helped him off with his coat, I told him that the social worker had stopped by.—‘What did she want?’—I told her that I was expecting. She became very upset. She said that she’d be back on Thursday to take me to this doctor, who would make my period come. If I refuse to go, they might take our benefit cards away. 

“Your father stood there for the longest while without saying a word. Finally, he spoke: ‘Very well, let them! Let them have their cards back! The Lord will provide.’ ”

At that point, my mother got to her feet and knelt down beside me. “Mom,” I insisted, “would you please stop this!”—“No! Let me finish!

“O Jesus, forgive me!  I didn’t want him then because of all our problems. And now I’m afraid of losing him?  Forgive me, Jesus, please forgive me!  You take him for your poor people in Peru.  Thank you, Jesus! Thank you!”

On two occasions of my life, I stayed awake all night long. One was a case of food poisoning in Peru.  The other was Mother’s Day 1970.  I tried to fall asleep, but to no avail. For the first time in my life—on learning how close I had come to not seeing the light of day—I fully realized what a precious gift life is.

Throughout the night, scenes from my boyhood intermingled with images of the heroine I had for a mother: “Hey, Victor, your Mom sure talks funny. I could hardly understand her.”  Gee, I wonder why my Mom can’t talk nice English like all the other mothers can. “No, I could never do that! I would rather die first!”  And she only went as far as the third grade in a backward school in Southern Italy.  “Is that your grandmother?”  No, that’s my Mom.  Her hair turned snow white when she was 30.  She had me when she was 35.  “At two months, all the major organs are formed and functioning. All that is required for birth is time and nourishment.”—“No, I could never do that! I would rather die first.”

I would like to close with the inspiring words that Cardinal Mindzenty penned many years ago about motherhood:

“A Christian mother cannot claim the honor of having built Notre Dame Cathedral.  She need not.  She has built something more magnificent than any cathedral—a dwelling for an immortal soul, the tiny perfection of her baby’s body.  The angels have not been blessed with such a grace…God joins forces with mothers in performing this act of creation.  What on God’s good earth is more glorious than this—to be a mother?”
—Bishop Victor Galeone, Bishop of St. Augustine, Florida, May 2010

1. Lack of Breastfeeding in Haiti? 2. Menopause: Does anything go?

Sunday, January 17th, 2010

1.   ABC World News this evening (1/17/10) showed a Haitian woman who had just delivered a baby.  She and her friends complained that she had no milk for her baby.  She was amply endowed and was not holding the baby.  The big question is why in a poverty stricken area is not every mother breastfeeding.   Why have not the relief organizations and missionaries promoted breastfeeding?

2. When a woman is menopausal, some couples think that any kind of sexual activity is a moral option.  But menopause does not change the meaning of the marriage act. 
 
A woman asks us:
       I am no longer of child-bearing age,and I wanted to know if it was ok for me as a wife to perform oral sex on my husband?   I am past menopause and some times it still causes me pain to have intercourse even when I use jellies and creams for dryness.  I’m sorry for the embarressing question. 
   

John responded:
       I assume that by oral sex you meant your oral stimulation of your husband that brings him to ejaculation outside of your vagina.  That is still masturbation and is immoral.  While it no longer has the effect of contraception, it still destroys the symbolism of the marriage act, the mutual gift of self in the act of genital-genital union.  In marriage we are given the right to engage in that act that of its very nature is oriented toward the procreation of children.  So even if you are no longer capable of providing an egg, the marriage act is still oriented toward the procreation of children and the bonding of the spouses.  
       From a practical perspective, an ample amount of KY jelly can or should provide ample lubrication.  Make sure that it is sufficiently applied and into the full area where you experience dryness.
       If by “oral sex” you mean oral-genital stimulation to bring your husband to an erection sufficient for genital-genital intercourse, that is morally okay.  In fact, it can be an act of charity if he is otherwise impotent.
       If you can help this organization, we will appreciate it.  Just go to the “Please donate” tab in the “And more” box on the home page.  Both prayers and pennies are needed. 
 
John F Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)

The Marriage Act and Oral-Genital Stimulation

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

There is no question that completed oral sex or anal sex is the grave matter of mortal sin.  It is the same sin committed by homosexuals who engage in those behaviors, and they thus deserve to be called forms of sodomy. 

The issue of oral genital stimulation (OGS) as foreplay to the completed genital-genital marriage act is not the same issue as marital sodomy.  Under some circumstances it can be good, even a form of charity.  In other circumstances it can be a major distraction and harmful to a marriage. 

Father Al Lauer, the late and great founder of Presentation Ministries strongly counsels against OGS for solely erotic purposes.  “I have been asked to counsel over a hundred married couples about oral sex as foreplay. After some time of discernment, not one has maintained that oral sex was a true expression of love. The motivation behind oral sex is often lust. The spouse is not the focus of the sexual foreplay; rather, sexual stimulation is the focus. It could almost be said that one spouse is having sex with sex rather than with the other spouse. This focus on sex rather than on the spouse is a poison to love and marriage.”  (See Oral Sex and Marriage, a brochure with an imprimatur published by Presentation Ministries and viewable at www.presentationministries.com/brochures/OralSex.asp.)     

The problem is that excessive focus on ways to maximize the pleasure of the marriage act can distract both spouses from the reality that the marriage act ought to be a renewal of the faith and love and commitment of their original marriage covenant.  What spouses really need is to help each other to grow in faith and holiness and to enjoy each other’s company in the kitchen and living room as well as in the bedroom. 

On the other hand, if OGS is the only way that a wife can arouse her otherwise impotent husband sufficiently for their marriage act, it can be an act of marital love, even an act of charity. 

Is there still some uncertainty?  Father Lauer quotes Pope Pius XII as quoted in The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2362.  “The Creator Himself…established that in the [generative] function, spouses should experience pleasure and enjoyment of body and spirit. Therefore, the spouses do nothing evil in seeking this pleasure and enjoyment. They accept what the Creator has intended for them. At the same time, spouses should know how to keep themselves within the limits of just moderation.”  

The question is, “What are the limits of just moderation?”  The experience and wisdom of Father Lauer leads him to conclude that OGS is a huge distraction, at the least, and generally harmful to marriage.  Whether it can be helpful in some marriages on some occasions is a question that is beyond my competence to answer.  One certainty is that it must be completely mutual if practiced at all; that is, it may never be forced. 

In summary:  1. OGS is lawful only between married spouses as foreplay to the completed genital-genital marriage act.  2.  It may be very dangerous to the marriage relationship.  3.  As couples age and impotence becomes a problem, it may be an act of charity.  4.  It must be mutually acceptable.

John F. Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)