Archive for 2013

Sterilization and Confession

Sunday, March 10th, 2013

Regarding the high rate of sterilization among weekly church attendees, among Catholics this may be due to a current confessional policy in which many priests tell penitents that they need to do only their canonical penance but do not have to change their behavior.  That is, they do not have to have a reversal and/or practice abstinence during the fertile time.  This makes the sin of contraceptively sterilized intercourse the only sin of which I am aware that does not require a change of behavior as part of repentance.  Chapter 12 of Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality explains why I think this is erroneous, but I’m still waiting for an invitation to speak publicly on the issue.  This chapter is at our website.

John F Kippley
Sex and the Marriage Covenant: A Basis for Morality (Ignatius)

The Marriage Act and Aging Spouses

Sunday, March 3rd, 2013

Q. When an aging married couple have difficulty engaging in the marriage act, can they resort to mutual masturbation or marital sodomy?

A. No.  Regardless of our ages,  the pleasures of the marriage act are reserved exclusively to the marriage act.

Sometimes there are some things that can be used to help the aging couple engage in the marriage act.  If the wife is suffering from vaginal dryness,a lubricant can be used.  It is for similar situations that a drug such as Viagra can be used.  I hate the Cialis ads so much that I don’t like to mention these things.  You certainly don’t see old duffers in their ads.

Q. If a married couple cannot engage in the marriage act, does that drain the marriage act of its unitive dimension?

No, the absence of the marriage act does not drain a marriage of its unitive dimension.  The marriage act is a unique expression of marital love and affection, but it is by no means the sole expression.  In fact, with a 50% divorce rate among contracepting married couples, it is clear that immediate and frequent access to the marriage bed is utterly no guarantee of a happy marriage.  If one or both spouses feel sorry for themselves, then the absence of the marriage act can be a real drag.  But if they accept it as part of growing old and focus more on showing affection in other ways, they may be happier than ever.  They can still give each other a big hug and a kiss in the kitchen.  The can still snuggle in bed, and one or the other or both may still experience sexual arousal in such circumstances. And if this is so, they are obliged not to let themselves be carried away to experience non-coital orgasm.

Marital chastity without the marriage act is not the celibacy of a married person with respect to someone not his or her spouse.  The signs of affection in the above paragraph are certainly forbidden with the next-door neighbor.  The non-marriage-act tokens of affection and caring love are important as signs of marriage.

Because of the nature of sexual pleasure, we married men sometimes have to ask ourselves if we are engaging in the act as an act of caring, marital love or whether it’s too much or too often primarily for our own satisfaction.  I’m not saying it is wrong to have pleasure on one’s mind. But we do need to keep in mind that the marriage act needs to be far from the sole expression of caring love for one’s spouse.  Lastly, it may sometimes be helpful for us who are entering the age of attending funerals and wondering who’s next that one of these days or years we won’t have each other.  And I suspect that when one becomes a widow or widower, she or he will be reflecting on their bedroom affection much less, if at all, than on whatever he or she did to make the spouse feel loved and cared for outside the bedroom.  (The morning I wrote this I attended the funeral of a man 12 years younger than myself.  And he was a widower of some years.)

I hope someone finds some of this helpful.

John F. Kippley
Battle-Scarred:  Justice Can Be Elusive
Sex and the Marriage Covenant:  A Basis for Morality
The Seven Day Bible Rosary: Different Mysteries for each day of the week

NFP: Breastfeeding Saves Lives and Spaces Babies

Sunday, February 24th, 2013

Natural Family Planning includes breastfeeding.  Breastfeeding is God’s plan for spacing babies.  It is the most natural NFP method and involves no abstinence.  But it does involve certain maternal behaviors associated with breastfeeding that are part of that plan and which offer the mother an extended period of infertility or amenorrhea.  That is why we  promote the Seven Standards of ecological breastfeeding.

Another wonderful benefit of breastfeeding is that breastfeeding is so healthy for the infant!  A new research report from an organization called Save The Children was released this year.  I will quote from this report the benefits of breastfeeding for just the first hour and for the first 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding.  Breast milk is a super food and should be provided to every infant.  

In 2011, 6.9 million children under five died.  Today 2 out of 5 of those children who die are not even one month old!  Worldwide, 830,000 infants would be saved if mothers breastfed within the first hour of life.  Infants given breast milk within one hour of birth are 3 times more likely to survive than those infants given breastfed a day later!  The most powerful protection in the early days of life is colostrum.  Colostrum is “the most potent natural immune system booster know to science.”

Worldwide we would save 1.4 million babies if mothers would exclusively breastfeed and continue breastfeeding into the second year.  Breastfeeding “is the closest thing there is to a ‘silver bullet’ to save these children’s lives…  Infants who are not breastfed are 15 times more likely to die from pneumonia and 11 times more likely to die of diarrhoea than those who are exclusively breastfed for the first 6 months of life…A study in Brazil found that infants who were not breastfed at all had a 14 times greater risk of death than those who were exclusively breastfed.”

The problem today is that some of the breastfeeding rates are falling and the baby-food industry plans to grow by 31% by 2015 with most of that growth planned for Asia.

What about churches which are concerned about social justice and poverty?  What can you do if you give financial support to missionary activity here and in other countries?  Send them the “Superfood for Babies” report.  Ask them if they teach, promote and support breastfeeding or do they hand the new mothers formula?  You may make a difference!

If your NFP teacher asks you to wean entirely so you can get back to cycling, look for another NFP teacher that supports breastfeeding or contact NFP International.

Sheila Kippley
Breastfeeding and Catholic Motherhood
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor