Breastfeeding as Super-Med

March 11th, 2012

Imagine that you are pregnant and that your doctor tells you he has a newly discovered drug that is the best preventive medicine he has ever seen.  It will reduce your baby’s risk of various gastrointestinal infections by 64% compared to the babies of mothers who didn’t use this medicine.  Then he told you that if you used this medicine for more than three months, your baby’s risk of a common ear infection would be reduced by 50%.  And he went on about the other benefits.  Would you start wondering if your insurance covered this wonder-drug?  And should you invest in the manufacturer’s stock since it would certainly be going up?

You can stop daydreaming.  You can have this “wonder med” for free.  Just breastfeed.  Rich or poor, that is the best gift you can give your baby.

On February 27, 2012 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a revised policy statement on “breastfeeding and the use of human milk.”  The emphasis in this publication was on the protection of breastfeeding with regard to many diseases and in saving babies’ lives.  I don’t see how any mother can read this and then decide not to breastfeed her baby.  The evidence is overwhelming, that breastfeeding makes for a healthier baby.

The AAP recommendation is the same: breastfeeding should be done exclusively for the first six months with complementary foods added and breastfeeding continuing for a year or longer. And “all preterm infants should receive human milk.”

According to this new AAP statement, what are the benefits for the baby?  Below I have listed the benefits for 1) any type of breastfeeding and for 2) exclusive breastfeeding for 3 or 4 or 6 months.

For Any Breastfeeding
—incidence of otitis media was reduced by 23%
—incidence of nonspecific gastrointestinal tract infections were reduced by 64%
—preterm infants receiving only human milk had a 77% reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis
36% reduction of SIDS
—52% reduction in celiac disease when infant is fed only breast milk at time of gluten exposure
—31% reduction in risk for childhood inflammatory bowel disease
—15% to 30% reduction in adolescent and adult obesity
—each month of breastfeeding is associated with a 4% reduction in risk of overweight
—40% reduction of type 2 diabetes mellitus
—intelligence scores and teacher’s ratings are significantly greater in breastfed infants
—preterm infants who receive primarily human milk have significantly better scores for mental, motor, and behavior ratings at ages 18 months and 30 months
—greatly reduces the risk for neglect or abuse by the mother

For Exclusive Breastfeeding for 3 Months
—risk of otitis media was reduced by 50% with exclusive breastfeeding for more than 3 months
—asthma, atopic dermatitis, and eczema reduced by 27% in low-risk population and 42% with a positive family history
—30% reduction of type 1 diabetes mellitus
—children have higher intelligence scores
—children have higher teacher ratings

For Exclusive Breastfeeding for 4 Months
—risk of hospitalization is reduced by 72% with more than 4 months of exclusive breastfeeding
—risk of the severity of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis was reduced by 74%

For Exclusive Breastfeeding for 6 Months
—risk of pneumonia had a four-fold increase with exclusive breastfeeding for 4 to 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding compared to those babies breastfed exclusively for more than 6 months
—risk of serious colds and ear and throat infections were reduced by 63%
—900 US infants’ lives saved
—1,000,000 infants’ lives saved in 42 developing countries
—20% reduction in risk of leukemia
—15% reduction in risk of acute lymphocytic leukemia
—could save $13 billion per year in the U. S.

Is there any benefit to the mother who breastfeeds?
Breastfeeding may provide her with natural child spacing due to delayed menses and may protect her from type 2 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, breast cancer and ovarian cancer.
(AAP Breastfeeding Policy, February 2012)

Sheila Kippley
The Seven Standards of Ecological Breastfeeding: The Frequency Factor

Thanks for the Online Natural Family Planning Manual

March 4th, 2012

The NFPI manual, Natural Family Planning: The Complete Approach, is available on the home page of NFPandmore.org.  A $10 donation is suggested for the download, and some contribute more, for which we are grateful.   For those who are truly poor, it is free.  Anyone may download the chart on the home page for free. Below are comments from those who appreciated the download of this manual.

“I was very appreciative that you made available the download version of the manual, etc. I think that your approach is welcoming, educated and balanced. I love that you don’t hide the Catholicism, but also don’t shove it down people’s throats (who may be protestant/secularist). It is a beautiful way of inviting people to practice NFP, ecological breastfeeding and maybe see the beauty of Catholicism ;).”

“Thanks for the great resources, especially the manual!”

“We have begun reading the NFP manual and checking my temperature so we can keep an eye out for my fertility. We are both thoroughly enjoying eco-breastfeeding. We take our baby everywhere and both enjoy the extra cuddling at night, especially my husband who commutes for an hour each direction to work everyday and misses the children sorely 5 days a week. Your book and website are truly a blessing to our whole family, offering us invaluable support in our battle to raise our family with God’s will and His plan instead of giving in to social pressure. Thank you, thank you, thank you!”

“The NFPI manual was very easy to read and understand, enabling quick use of NFP.  This is our first month using it.  We switched immediately from contraception, and we are already noticing a difference in our relationship.”

“I really appreciated your Biblical foundation to marriage relationships. It helped my husband and me to really understand and follow God’s view of the marriage act. I recommend people getting married to read your Introduction in the NFP book because I think it is a lot more solid than most mainstream Christian views.”

“Thank you for providing this book online for small donations. My husband and I are converts to the Catholic faith and I wanted to start out right in all aspects, but we couldn’t afford several hundred for classes. Once we have the extra money I plan to take the NFPI home study course for a certificate.”

“We forgot to donate during the initial download of the manual, but we”ve since given $25.00. Hope it helps you help other people like me.”

“Thank YOU for providing this invaluable information without charging an arm and a leg.  I figure, if you want Catholics to practice NFP, it should be easy to get access to materials, and some people just don’t have money for fancy courses but still want to do what’s morally right.”

Sheila Kippley

HHS Mandate and Reflections

February 26th, 2012

With regard to fighting the mandate, I agree that at one level the emphasis has to be on the First Amendment.  But I also think that we need to do what we can to point out that giving hormonal birth control is not good medicine. And we need to point out also that the claim to a right to free birth control is simply an outrageous example of the entitlement attitude that is sinking this country economically.

I think we need to recognize that this is in large part due to 43 years of ecclesiastical neglect of conscience formation regarding these issues.  I think it is entirely possible that Mr. Obama and Mrs. Sibelius have never met a fertile-age married person who actually believes and lives by what the Church teaches regarding marital love and sexuality.  (Okay, so they know Rick Santorum.)   But they are certainly aware of the statistics at the USCCB website that show that fertile-age Catholics are overwhelmingly in favor of the birth control practices they want to mandate.

Back in the Seventies or Eighties I was accused by a priest in another diocese of teaching against the bishops because I was critical of their still keeping archdissenter Fr. Charles Curran at CUA.  (Pope John Paul II finally forced his removal after 19 years.)

Sheila and I started an NFP course on February 8 at St. Lawrence parish here in Cincinnati.  I sent announcements to every parish in the city.  We had four registrations, all engaged couples at St. Lawrence, thanks to Father Watkins making the course a normal part of preparation for marriage.  At least 90% of fertile-age church-going Catholics are using unnatural forms of birth control; only 1.1% are using some form of systematic NFP.  This is well known.  The donation for our course is the cheapest in the area (half of what another teaching couple charges), so money can’t be the reason.

In NFPI we do not teach “Catholic birth control.  We try to teach generosity.  We promote and teach ecological breastfeeding, and where else are local engaged couples going to hear this today?  That alone should be sufficient reason for our priests to insist that their engaged couples take the NFPI course.

I certainly agree that we need to support our bishops in this battle against the HHS mandate.  While most fertile-age Catholics are already using unnatural forms of birth control, and while most Catholic doctors and medical practices are already doing what HHS wants, it is another thing entirely to be forced to do these things.

The time has come for our bishops, priests and deacons to realize that they can no longer ignore, for all practical purposes, the teaching of Humanae Vitae.  They need to provide practical motivation, and they need to realize that the practical and theological help we have been offering for 40 years (yes, 41 come this fall) is first rate even though dirt cheap.
_________________
A public response to John:

I completely agree with you, John! I was out in the schools–Catholic and public–teaching abstinence for 5 years. It was a hard road. I was involved in high school youth ministry at my parish for 17 years, mainly on the spiritual retreats. We mostly had the “cream of the crop”–those who wanted to get closer to God. Lots of them Catholic. They didn’t really want to hear the abstinence message either. Most of them didn’t understand why the boys had separate sleeping quarters from the girls and why one wasn’t allowed in the other’s sleeping area or why opposites weren’t allowed in each other’s sleeping bags! Girls “spooning” with guys was totally OK with them. Just look at how women–adolescents and on up–dress for Mass or better yet for their weddings!

I know from this experience, that abortion won’t end until modesty and morality return; and at this point, that has to start in the pulpit. It’s time for all religious–sisters, brothers, deacons, priests, etc–to stop worrying about offending their congregation and quake in their boots over the souls that are being lost to sin because of their sin of pride for the praise of men. If the world loves you, it is because it doesn’t love God. If you are going to stand in for Jesus–EXPECT TO NOT BE LIKED AND TO BE PERSECUTED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!  It was hard for me, I didn’t like it. Lots of times I felt like Jeremiah, but I knew what I was responsible for and who I would be answering to if I didn’t tell them the truth.

Their outrage is 20 years too late. So I’m praying for the Bishops–mostly that God has mercy on their souls.
_______________

Other comments by John regarding the mandate.
“What editors and the readers need to see is that hormonal birth control is bad news because it increases the risks of several diseases–breast cancer included.  To foist this on unsuspecting teenagers is simply evil. ”

“I would add one more factor.  Regardless of the demerits or merits of any kind of birth control, the choice is a personal one.  Taxpayers should not be picking up the tab for personal choices which are essentially a matter of personal responsibility.  And I would say the same thing about Viagra-type drugs.  Reining in the cost of health care has to start someplace, and it seems to me that personal choice items simply have to go.”

For the dangers of taking the birth control pill, read the Lanfranchi and Brind online booklet on breast cancer at the NFPI website.

John F. Kippley
Battle-Scarred: Justice Can Be Elusive